PURCHASE TAX UNDER PUNJAB VAT ACT 20051 comments Thursday, February 24, 2011Normally VAT is leviable on the sales of goods by a dealer but in certain circumstances and on certain goods tax is also levied on the purchases made under Punjab VAT Act 2005. Chapter III of Punjab VAT Act 2005 deals with the purchase tax. The provisions relating to purchase tax under PVAT Act are discussed as follows. When purchase tax is levied: Purchase tax is levied under PVAT Act 2005 in two cases firstly in respect of some goods specified in schedule H and secondly on the taxable turnover of purchase of goods in certain circumstances. 1. Purchase Tax on certain Goods: Section 19 of PVAT Act deals with the levy of purchase tax on certain goods. Some important points from the provisions of section 19 are provided as follows: Non-obstante clause: Firstly the provisions of section 19(1) starts with the word “Notwithstanding any thing contained in this Act” which means that its an non-obstante clause that is to say section 19 will have applicability irrespective of any provision existing contrary to section 19 in the Act.. Purchase tax u/s 19 to be only on goods mentioned in Schedule H :Secondly from section 19(1) it is clear that VAT under PVAT Act 2005 will be levied on the taxable turnover of purchase of the goods specified in Schedule H at the rate applicable to such goods as per the schedules. There are five goods which have been prescribed in schedule H
Purchase tax u/s 19 to be levied only on the first purchase: Section 19(2) provides the manner of leving of purchase tax on the schedule H goods. It lays down that tax shall be leviable on the first purchase of these goods from within the state. However in case of Milk the first purchase, on which purchase tax will be leviable, will be the purchase when is made by a manufacturer of taxable goods. Here first purchase must mean purchasing of goods for the first time mentioned in schedule H after their production. Leviability of purchase tax on schedule H goods doesnot exempt the subsequent sales of such goods from VAT. Proviso to section 19(2) clearly provides that subsequent sales of such goods(on which purchase tax has been paid) shall be liable to VAT as per the provisions of the Act. Rate of Purchase tax: Since the purchase tax on schedule H goods is applicable as per the rates of tax on such goods as applicable in the schedules appended to PVAT Act therefore we need to see the rates in the said schedules. Paddy, wheat and cotton are declared goods under section 14 of CST Act 1956 and are taxable @4% whereas Sugarcane and Milk, when purchased for use in manufacture of any goods other than tax free goods are schedule B items and are taxable @ 5% currently.Hence purchase tax will be 4% on Paddy, Wheat,cotton and on Sugarcane , Milk when purchased for use in manufacture of any goods other than tax free goods, will be 5%, (after adding surcharge it will be 5.5%). Input tax credit of purchase tax paid: As per section 19(4) that purchase tax paid by a taxable person on goods mentioned in schedule H shall be admissible as input tax credit only if the following conditions are satisfied:
Proviso to section 19(4) provides that if purchases of schedule H goods i.e on which purchase tax is leviable, are used partially for the purpose of manufacture of taxable goods and partially for the purpose of tax free goods, then purchase tax paid on such goods shall be admissible as input tax credit proportionately, to the extent, the purchases are used for such purposes in the manner prescribed. ITC of purchase tax to be limited to the extent of CST only if goods sold interstate: Sub section 5 of section 19 provides that if the goods mentioned in schedule H are sold interstate then ITC of purchase tax paid on such goods will be available only to the extent of CST chargeable under CST Act 1956. Thus it means if purchase tax @ 5.5% has been paid on a schedule H good say sugarcane, and such sugarcane is sold interstate by charging CST @ 2% then ITC of purchase tax will be available only to the extent of 2%. 2. Purchase Tax on turnover of purchase of goods in certain circumstances: Section 20 of PVAT Act provides certain circumstances where tax on the purchase of a Registered or Taxable person may be levied. These circumstances have been enumerated so as to ensure that no taxable turnover of any Taxable or Registered person may escape tax under the Act. However this levy of tax on purchase turnover u/s 20 is subject to levy of purchase tax u/s 19 of the Act. Since the proviso to section 19(1) provides that if a tax has already has been paid u/s 19 on certain goods then no tax shall be levied u/s 20 even though circumstances as enumerated u/s 20 exists. Circumstances under which purchase tax u/s 20 may be levied are provided as follows: Where a taxable person purchases taxable goods from a person other than a taxable person or a registered person, and - (a) uses such goods in the manufacture of goods, declared tax-free under section 16; or (b) uses such goods in the manufacture of any goods other than those specified in Schedule-A, and sends the goods so manufactured outside the State otherwise than by way of sale in the course of inter-State trade or commerce or exports out of India; or (c) disposes of such goods in any manner other than by way of sale in the State; or (d) despatches them to a place outside the State otherwise than as a result of sale in the course of inter-state sale, trade or commerce or export out of India, there shall be levied a tax on the taxable turnover of purchases of such goods at the rate applicable to such goods as per the Schedules Purchase Tax on TOT dealer:Sub section 2 of Section 15 further provides that if a registered person (i.e TOT Dealer) purchases taxable goods from a person other than a taxable or registered person then purchase tax shall be levied on the such purchase turnover at the rate as applicable to the goods purchased in the schedules appended to PVAT Act 2005. Share | Some Important recent orders u/s 85 of PVAT Act 20050 comments Wednesday, February 23, 2011Section 85 of the PVAT Act empowers the Commissioner under the Act to determine any disputed question as may arise otherwise than in proceedings before a Court or before the commencement of assessment of a person under section 29. Here some recent important orders of Commissioner u/s 85 of PVAT Act are being shared here: Order dated 25/10/2010 regarding determination of rates of tax on certain goods Name of the Applicant Sh. Naginder Mohan Sharma, S/o Sh. Prithvi Nath Sharma, R/o 41, Hardev Nagar, Street No.10 Kapurthala Road,Jalandhar. Question for determination: Clarification regarding rate of tax applicable on the goods mentioned below: 1. PVC Sole for football Shoe 1. RBR Sole for football Shoe 2. Jogger Sole 3. Running Spikes Plate 4. PVC Sole for cricket Shoe 5. RBR Sole for Cricket Shoe 6. PVC Sole for Badminton Shoe 7. RBR Sole Badminton Shoe 8. Phylone Sole 9. PVC Sole football Stud 10. Football Stud Sole 11. Insole Determination: The above items are not covered under Schedule-B. They do not qualify to be raw material either and therefore are unclassified goods taxable @ 12.5% and surcharge leviable thereon under section 8-B of the PVAT Act, 2005. Order dt 25/10/2010 on section 13(3) of PVAT Act and Rule 20 of PVAT Rules: Name of the Applicant M/s SGS International, 741-742 , Phase-VIII, Focal Point Ludhiana. Relevant section and rule: “Section 13 (3) Where a taxable person sends any goods as such or after being partially processed for further processing on job work basis, he shall debit the ITC by four percent of the value of such goods. If such goods after processing are received back by such person, the ITC debited at the time of despatch, shall be restored. Such person shall, however, be required to produce proper evidence in the shape of records, challans or memos or any other document evidencing receipt of such goods, whenever asked for.” Rule 20 of PVAT Rules: “Eligibility of input tax credit on job work.--Input tax credit shall be allowed, if any taxable goods as such or after being partially processed, are sent by a manufacturer, registered under the Act to a job worker for further processing, testing,. repair, reconditioning or any other purpose , and it is established from the challan or relevant documents produced by the taxable person concerned that the goods in question have been received back by him within a period of ninety days from the date of dispatch to the job worker.” Question for Determination: 1. : Whether Input tax credit debited on transfer of goods for job work can be restored if the goods are received back after a period of ninety days which is against the rule 20 of PVAT Act, 2005. 2. Whether in such cases penalty can be imposed under section 60 of the PVAT Act, 2005, if the taxable goods are covered by proper documents and are received back after 90 days. Determination: 1. The amount of input tax credit debited in respect of taxable goods sent for job work and received back after a period of 90 days can be restored if the taxable person is able to prove with the help of documents that the same goods are received back. It can be accepted as a special case. The dealer should be able to prove / produce sufficient reasons for delay in getting goods back beyond the prescribed limit of 90 days. This delay should be of only few days under special extra ordinary circumstances. 2. If the taxable goods after job work are received back after a period of 90 days the provision of Section 60 of PVAT Act are to be revoked Order dated 26/11/2010 on rate applicable on Battery operated vehicles Name of the Applicant M/s Sewaco Motors, 25-BDA Complex, Near KMV College Pathankot Chowk, Jalandhar. Question for determination: “Whether battery operated vehicles fall under entry no, 94 of Schedule-B of the PVAT Act, 2005 relating to renewable energy devices and spare parts” Determination: The battery operated vehicles do not fall under entry no 94 of Schedule-B and are taxable as unclassified item falling under Schedule-F of the PVAT Act, 2005 and is therefore taxable @ 12.5% in addition to surcharge leviable thereon. The question is determined accordingly. Order dated 29/12/2010 regarding entry at serial no. 133 of Schedule-B of PVAT Act, 2005 Name of the Applicant M/s Promark Techsolutions Pvt. Ltd., Morinda Bye-pass, Ludhiana Highway, Village Badi Madauli, Morinda (Ropar) Relevant entry: 133. Writing Insturments, geometry boxes, colour boxes, brushes for colour boxes, crayons pencil, pencil sharpeners and erasers. Question for determination: “ Whether Black Boards being writing instruments, are covered in Schedule-B appended to the PVAT Act, 2005 and is taxable @ 5% or fall in Schedule-F and liable to tax @ 12.5%” Determination: the entry no. 42 of Schedule-B of the repealed PGST Act, 1948 is different from entry no. 133 of Schedule-B attached to the PVAT Act, 2005. The Black Board cannot be treated as writing instruments rather it is a medium to write on and not an instrument for writing. Hence, the Black Board falls under Schedule-F of PVAT Act, 2005 and is taxable @ 12.5%. Share | Correction in OLTAS Income Tax/TDS challan after payment2 comments Tuesday, February 22, 2011Recently I faced a situation where the tax demand on regular assessment of my client for A.Y 2008-09 was deposited with a nationalized bank but wrongly the said payment of demand was done towards A.Y 2010-11. This situation may have been faced by many assessees because there may always be a possibility of mentioning wrong Assessment year or wrong PAN/TAN etc in the TDS Challan or in Income Tax Challans. In such situation the first thing that comes to mind is how one can get the challan corrected after the payment of tax so that right credit of tax is given to the assessee/deductor concerned. The power to amend such wrong details in challan after payment of tax in OLTAS has been given to Assessing officer and Bank depending upon the type of correction, which has been provided as follows for the benefit of all concerneds. NSDL receives tax collection data as uploaded by the bank. It is not authorized to carry out any changes in the data sent by the bank to TIN. The fields that can be corrected and the entity authorized to carry out corrections are as below:
Thus application should be made for correction to the A.O or Bank in case of any mistake in Income Tax/TDS Challan depending upon the type of correction as mentioned above. Share | Giving Shuttering on hire to builders for use in construction is deemed sales- Rent Received therefrom is liable to VAT under Punjab VAT0 comments Monday, February 21, 2011The word Sale has been defined under section 2(zf) of Punjab VAT Act 2005 as including the transfer of the right to use any goods for any purpose (whether or not for a specified period) for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration. Thus transfer of right to use any goods is also considered as deemed sales. Such transfer also includes giving shuttering goods on hire for use in the cource of construction of a building or any other structure. Expenses Disallowed under section 40A(3) and 40A(3A) of Income Tax Act 19610 comments Sunday, February 20, 2011Section 40A(3) of Income Tax Act 1961 provides for disallowance of expenses in respect of which a payment or aggregate of payments made to a person in a day, otherwise than by an account payee cheque drawn on bank or account payee bank draft, exceeds Rs 20000 and Section 40A(3A) provides for the payment in excess of Rs 20000 in a day made otherwise than account payee cheque or account payee bank draft, for an allowance made in the assessment for any year on the basis of incurred liability, to be treated as income of the year in which such payment is made. These relevant and important provisons and exceptions to them are provided as follows GST Information Technology Strategy1 comments Saturday, February 19, 2011I have received The IT strategy for GST implementation. It contains the broad IT plan for enabling GST, which was presented to Government of India and Empowered committee of State Finance Ministers on 21-7-2010. The strategy is very helpful in understanding the procedural aspect of GST and understanding how it will work when comes to IT infrastructure required for implementation of GST as and when it comes into operation. I am sharing it here for the benefit of all readers. It can be downloaded by clicking at the following link which will take you to my files wherefrom it can be downloaded: IT Strategy for GST Share | Checking the Income tax Refund status just a click away1 comments Friday, February 18, 2011The Income tax Refund status can be known just by a click. You just need your PAN and the relevant assessment year for which refund is due. This facility has been provided by www.tin.nsdl.com. I frequently check refund status of my clients at the following link shared for the benefit of all concerneds. Even if you have filed your return mannually you can still check your refund status at the following link, since the refund in mannual returns is also being sent by the Income Tax Department to Refund Banker nowadays and no refunds are issued mannualy at the Department.DTH service is also subject to Entertainment duty in addition to service tax-P&H High Court1 comments Thursday, February 17, 2011Punjab and Haryana High Court in a recent case namely Tata Sky Limited v State of Punjab and another (2011)38 PHT 160 (P&H) has held that levy of entertainment duty on providing entertainment by broadcasting signals on TV sets is intravires of the powers of the State Lagislature. The Petitions of TATA Sky Limited challenging the levy of entertainment duty under Punjab Entertainment Duty Act 1955, has been dismissed. The question which arose for consideration in this case was whether levy of entertainment tax on DTH service Provider is covered by Entry 62 of List II or is tax on broadcasting service covered by Entry 92C of List I. Guidelines for Input Tax Credit(ITC) under PVAT Act 2005- The official verdict0 comments Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Penultimate Sales under CST Act 1956-Submission of H forms.0 comments Sunday, February 13, 2011Tax by State Governments on sales or purchase of goods made during the cource of import or export of such goods is prohibited by article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution of India. Section 6(1) of CST Act also levies tax on interstate sales hence there is no CST liability on the sale is the cource of import or export of goods. Thus neither the State Government can impose tax/vat on sales of goods in the cource of import or export nor CST Act 1956 imposes any tax on such sales. Here in this article exemptions available on Penultimate export sales under CST Act 1956 are concentrated on: What is Export sales: The word Export sales means direct exports i.e direct selling of goods out of India. The word Export sales has not been used in the CST Act 1956 but the word sales in the cource of exports has been used which is a wider term and includes not only direct export but also sales by transfer of documents after goods cross customs frontier and the Penultimate sale for export and export with the help of agent. Thus even indirect export could also be sales in the cource of exports. Help guide for applying Import-Export code0 comments Saturday, February 12, 2011IEC code can be now applied online at the site http://dgft.gov.in/ I have received a file which explains how to apply IEC code online as well as mannual.I am sharing it for benefit of visitors to my blog. For helpguide on how to apply Import-Export code(IEC code) click on the following link Help Guide on IEC Share | Monetory limits for filing appeals by Income Tax Department before Appellate Tribunal, HCs, SC raised.0 commentsMonetory Limits for filing of appeals on merits by department before Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and Supreme Court have been raised by CBDT vide its instruction no. 3/2011 [F. NO. 279/MISC. 142/2007-ITJ], DATED 9-2-2011. Earlier the monetory limits for filing appeals by Department were as follows: Existing monetary limits for assigning cases of Income Tax to ITOs and DCs/ACs, raised by CBDT0 commentsThe limits for assigning cases to Deputy Commissioners/Assistant Commissioners and ITOs have been revised by CBDT w.e.f 01-04-2011. The changes has been done with a view to remove that was caused to taxpayers in mofussil(i.e. small stations/cities other than metro cities) areas because of existing monetary limits which results in transfer of their cases to Deputy Commissioners/Assistant Commissioners which are located in some other station. The relevant circular is produced herebelow for ready reference of readers: Due date for submission of ITR-V for A.Y 2010-11 extended to 31st July 20110 commentsThe due date for submission of ITR-V form relating to Income Tax Returns for A.Y 2010-11 has been extended to 31st July 2011 or within 120 days from the date of uploading of electronic return data, whichever is later by CBDT vide its circular dated 10-02-2011. The relevant circular and press release is produced herebelow for ready reference. A brief on exemptions available to SEZ unit or SEZ developer from CST under CST Act 19560 comments Friday, February 11, 2011Section 8(6),8(7) and 8(8) of the CST Act deals with the exemptions available to a SEZ unit or SEZ developer from CST. When goods are sold to a SEZ unit or SEZ developer then no CST is payable by such unit or developer as per the above sub sections subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. The conditions and forms relating to such exemption are provided as follows for the benefit of all concerned. What is SEZ: Before discussing the relevant provisions one need to understand what SEZ means. Full form of SEZ is Special Economic Zone. These are designated areas in countries that possess special economic regulations that are different from other areas in the same country. Moreover, these regulations tend to contain measures that are conducive to foreign direct investment. Conducting business in a SEZ usually means that a company will receive tax incentives and the opportunity to pay lower tariffs. Provisions of section 40(b) of Income Tax Act 19611 comments Monday, February 7, 2011Section 40(b) of Income Tax Act places some restrictions and conditions on the deductions of expenses available to an assessee assessable as a partnership firm in relation to the remuneration and interest payable to the partners of such firm. The deductions regarding salary to partners and any payment of interest to partners cannot exceed the monetory limits specified u/s 40(b) and are available subject to the fulfillment of conditions mentioned therein. The following conditions must be satisfied before claiming any deduction in respect of salary/remuneration or interest payable to partners by a partnership firm. Tax Payable in works contracts under Punjab VAT Act 20050 comments Friday, February 4, 2011Here in this article the tax payable in case of works contracts is concentrated on in view of the addition of new provisions in this regards u/s 8 of the PVAT Act 2005. Section 8 of PVAT Act 2005 which deals with the rates of tax has been amended w.ef. 21/10/2010 to provide for sub section 2-A explaining the tax payable in works contracts which runs as under: “(2-A) Every person executing works contracts shall pay tax on the value of goods at the time of incorporation of such goods in the works executed at the rates applicable to the goods under this Act: SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO REFUNDS UNDER PUNJAB VAT ACT 20050 comments Tuesday, February 1, 2011For the successfull administration of any tax law refund of tax to the assessee is as much importance as ensuring tax payment from the assessee. Refund in tax laws whether (indirect or direct) arises primarily due to the reason of excess tax paid than actual due, secondary reasons may be like refund arising out of a judgement of a court or an order of an authority. Here in this article refund provisions under Punjab VAT Act 2005 are concentrated on. When Refund may arise under Punjab VAT Act 2005: Refund under Punjab VAT Act 2005 may arise due to many reasons. VAT Refund ussualy arises to the exporters or the person doing penultimate export i.e sales against H forms, due to the fact that the export of goods outside India is considered as zero rated sales i.e not liable for any vat liability and the tax paid on purchase of goods which are to be exported is refunded to the exporters as per provisions of section 18(2) of PVAT act 2005. Tax deduction from Works contracts only to be on the taxable turnover involved in the works contract under Punjab VAT Act 20050 comments Friday, January 14, 2011Almost all States under their respective VAT laws have made provisions for deduction of VAT from payment to be made to the works contractors at the time of the payment (popularly known as works contract tax or VAT TDS on works contract). The Punjab VAT Act is no exception in this regard. Section 27 of PVAT Act deals with the provisions relating to tax deductions from payments to be made under a works contract. Here in this article the provisions of section 27 of PVAT Act 2005 are concentrated on in view of the latest decision of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High court in Larsen and Tourbo v State of Haryana case. What is Works Contract: Before proceeding with the topic it is necessary to give a brief meaning of works contract. Works contract has been defined inclusively u/s2(zu) of Punjab VAT Act 2005 to mean as including any agreement for carrying out, for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, building, construction, manufacturing, processing, fabrication, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repairs or commissioning of any movable or immovable property. In general terms works contract can be defined as a contract of some work for valuable consideration which includes both supply of goods as well as labour/services. Construction of buildings, roads, bridges, making of lifts, sign boards etc are some examples of works contracts. Deduction of tax from payment made to works contractors under PVAT Act: Section 27(1) of PVAT Act 2005 which deals with deduction of tax from payments made to works contractors, runs as under: Notwithstanding anything contained in any of the provisions of this Act, every contractee responsible for making payment to any person (hereinafter in this section referred to as the contractor) for discharge of any liability on account of valuable consideration, exceeding rupees five lac in a single contract payable for the transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) in pursuance of a works contract, shall, at the time of making such payment to the contractor either in cash or in any other manner, deduct an amount equal to two per cent of such sum towards the tax payable under this Act on account of such contract: Provided that any individual or Hindu undivided family not registered under this Act, shall not be liable for deduction of such tax. Section 27(1) starts with the words “Nothwithstanding anything contained in any of the provisions of this act” which shows that the provision is a non abstante clause which means section 27(1) will be applicable irrespective of anything contrary to it contained in the other provisions of the Act. On which amount the tax is to be deducted?: The first question that comes to mind while deducting tax under section 27 of PVAT Act 2005 is on which value of works contract Tax should be deducted i.e whether on the whole value of works contract including service component and interstate sales if any etc or only on that part of works contract on which the contractor is liable to pay tax under the relevant state VAT act. Section 27(1) doesnot provide specific answer to it clearly. Although it is written in the said section that deduction is to be made for the amount payable for transfer of Property in Goods( whether in goods or in some other form) made in pursuance of works contract. Section 27(1) doesnot specify clearly whether the labour part included in the works contract or the value of the works contract involving interstate sales or sales in the cource of import are to be excluded or not while making tax deductions from the works contract payments by the contractee. Hon’ble Supreme court in Steel Authority of India v. State of Orissa [2000] 118 STC 297(SC), Nathpa fhakri ft. Venture v. State of Himachal Pardesh[2000] 118 STC 306 (SC) and Rapti commission Agency v. State of U.P.{2006] 147 STC 566(SC), has taken a view that if a person is not liable for payment of tax at all, at any time, the collection of tax from him, with a possible contingency of refund at a later stage, will not make the original levy valid. Labour component involved in the value of a works contract is not liable for any tax under Punjab VAT Act as also the interstate sales or sales outside the state and sales in the cource of import. If there is no levy of tax on a turnover then there cannot be collection of tax on it by the authorities. If we consider the above view of the Supreme court then tax u/s 27 should be deducted only on the taxable turnover part of works contract that is to say tax should be deducted only on that part of works contract on which the contractor would be liable to pay tax under the relevant VAT Act. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High court in a latest case Larsen & Toubro Limited Vs.The State of Haryana and others CWP No.14797 of 2010 Decided on 26.10.2010 wherein validity of statutory provisions in Sales Tax law in Punjab and Haryana for deduction of tax at source out of payment made to contractors for execution of works contracts involving transfer of property in goods at specified rate was challenged, has held considering the view of Supreme court in the cases referred above that the impugned provisions i.e section 27 of PVAT Act 2005 and section 24 of Haryana VAT act 2003 as ultra vires as it did not provide any mechanism for the exclusion of labour component or interstate sales or sales outside the sate or sales in the cource of imports from the value of works contract while deduction of tax, but instead of striking down the impugned provisions the Hon’ble court has decided on the proposal of the petitioners in that case that the provisions of section 27 of PVAT Act and u/s 24 of HVAT Act 2003 will be applicable only to the taxable turnover i.e. after deducting service component and turnover relating to sales outside State, in the course of inter-State sales or in the course of import. The petitioner (Contractor) will give declaration in respect of such payments to the persons making the payment(Contractee) with a copy to the concerned assessing authority. The relevant portion of the said Judgment is produced herebelow: “After due consideration of the rival stands, we find that the proposal made on behalf of the petitioners as an alternative to striking down statutory provisions being in consonance with the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has to be accepted. This is so as the States propose to do their duty of providing an appropriate mechanism to give effect to the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Accordingly, we hold that impugned provisions for deduction of tax at source will apply only to the taxable turnover i.e. after deducting service component and turnover relating to sales outside State, in the course of inter-State sales or in the course of import. The petitioner will give declaration in respect of such payments to the persons making the payment with a copy to the concerned assessing authority. This will be without prejudice to the provisions of assessment, levy of interest, penalty, recovery and all other statutory provisions. This arrangement will continue till any other appropriate arrangement is worked out by the States of Punjab and Haryana. We further direct that pending assessments upto the year 2009-10, may be finalized within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and with regard to assessment for the year 2010-11, a provisional assessment be made relating to TDS amounts within the same period.” Thus tax u/s 27 of PVAT Act 2005 and u/s 24 of Haryana Vat Act 2003 tax on works contract needs to be deducted only on the taxable turnover of the works contract after the said judgment as explained above. Rates on certain goods changed under Punjab VAT Act 20050 comments Wednesday, January 12, 2011Punjab Government has changed vat rates on certain goods w.e.f 07-01-2011. Relevant Public Notice and notification is produced herebelow for ready reference of readers:
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
Featured PostTCS to apply only on cash portion of sales transaction CBDT clarifiesWelcome clarification by CBDT on TCS on Cash Sale. CBDT vide Circular No. 23/2016 dt. 24 June 2016 has clarified on FAQs of stakeholde... 
AddThisShareThisGet updates via email, just subscribe below and click on activation link afterwards in your emailCategory
Right consultancy at right time avoids unnecessary litigation.
Popular Posts
FollowersAbout Me
FeedjitBlog Archive
WARNING
Nobody is permitted to copy or publish the articles existing on this blog on any website or on any other media without my express permission. Total PageviewsDisclaimer
No one is responsible for any claims if somebody finds that the information/opinions provided in this blog is incorrect and the blog is meant only to share knowledge and exchange views in a meaningful manner.
Useful Links
Powered by Blogger.
|
Subscribe To
Posts
All Comments
|
