0 comments Sunday, January 25, 2015Read On
0 comments Thursday, January 22, 2015Read On
0 comments Wednesday, January 21, 2015Read On
The Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab has issued instructions to grant advance VAT exemption to the works contractors whose TDS u/s 27 of Punjab VAT Act, 2005 is being deducted.
0 comments Thursday, January 8, 2015Read On
The Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP 19835 of 2014 Ayyappa Infra Projects Pvt Ltd vs State of Punjab has directed the State of Punjab to issue clarification to the effect that works contractors are also eligible for exemption from advance VAT levied u/s 6(7) of Punjab VAT Act, 2005.
0 comments Tuesday, January 6, 2015Read On
The Punjab Government has notified the Email ids of all the important functionaries in the State of Punjab. The Email Ids includes ids of all Financial Commissioners, Principal Secretaries, Administrative Secerataries and Head of the Departments.
0 comments Sunday, January 4, 2015Read On
Kisan Vikas Patra Rules, 2014
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Economic Affairs)
New Delhi, the 23rd September, 2014
0 commentsRead On
Central Board of Direct Taxes vide instruction no. 7/2014 dated 26.09.2014, by virtue of its powers under section 119 of the Act, in suppression of earlier instructions/ guidelines on this subject, hereby directs that tile cases selected for scrutiny during the Financial Year 2014-2015 under CASS, on the basis of Either AIR data or CIB information or for non reconciliation with 26AS Data, the scope of enquiry should be limited to verification of these particular aspects only.
0 comments Friday, January 2, 2015Read On
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE AND TAXATION
0 commentsRead On
Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab has notified paper board sold by manufacturers in the State of Punjab for the purose of Rule 64-A of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005. Rule 64-A compulsory reporting of intra-state transactions through virtual information collection centre on the official website of the Department i.e. www.pextax.com. It is also popularly known as E-trip.
0 commentsRead On
The Hon'ble Punjab VAT Tribunal has ordered for the compliance of Rule 71 of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005 while filing appeals under Punjab VAT Act, 2005. The Punjab VAT Tribunal in appeal No. 450 of 2013 has ordered that no appeal in furture will be entertained if the same is filed with deficiencies in violation of Rule 71 of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005.
SC: Mobile charger is an accessory of mobile phone and not its integral part; leviable to VAT at 12.5%1 comments Thursday, December 25, 2014
Where assessee was selling mobile phone with battery charger in same packing, it did not charge any separate amount for battery charger from customers and was charging only for handset; battery charger was an accessory to cell phone and was not a part of it, thus, liable to VAT at general rate of 12.5 %.
Period of holding of flat to be counted from date of allotment letter and not from date of possession0 comments Friday, November 14, 2014
Law Point settled: Period of holding of a flat for the purpose of calculating capital gains, is to be reckoned from the date of allotment letter and not from the date of possession
Punjab & Haryana High Court stays passing of final orders in assessment cases of year 06-07, 07-08 and 08-090 comments Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Punjab & Haryana High Court has stayed the passing of final orders in assessment cases of years 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 under Punjab VAT Act, 2005 in the case of M/s ABC Ltd vs State of Punjab. The said company had challenged the vires of the amendment in section 29 of Punjab VAT Act, 2005 whereby the limitation period of all the assessment cases including that of 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 was extended from three years to six years. For the assessment of year 2006-07 the time limit was extended till 20th November, 2014.
0 comments Sunday, November 9, 2014Read On
Now a days It is seen that the Excise and Taxation Department, Punjab has started issuing notices for amendment in assessment in many cases. These notices are being issued ussualy on the basis of audit objections received from State CAG or sometimes on the ground that some of the law points were misinterpreted by the predecessor of the assessing officer, while framing original assessment.
0 comments Thursday, October 30, 2014Read On
Dealer cannot be denied benefit due to cancellation of R.C. of other dealer, unless the same is published in official gazette0 comments Sunday, October 19, 2014
Punjab & Haryana High Court in an older case namely Arjan Radio House vs Assessing Authority had held that a person's registration certificate shall be deemed to have been cancelled w.e.f date of publication of the factum of cancellation in the official Gazette as a busy seller cannot be supposed to know whether the registration certificate of a purchasing dealer has been cancelled or not unless he can be fixed with the knowledge of this fact.
0 comments Wednesday, October 15, 2014Read On
Justice AN Jindal (retd), who had given a clean chit to Shiromani Akali Dal minister Sikandar Singh Maluka in the alleged multi-crore scam of government school books, is set to become the chairman of Punjab Value Added Tax (VAT) Tribunal.
0 comments Sunday, October 5, 2014Read On
The Hon'ble Supreme Court has very well explained general rules relating to retrospective laws in a recent landmark case namely CIT vs Vatika Township (P) Ltd. Civil Appeal No. 1160 of 2007 dt. 15.09.2014. In this case the primary issue was whether section 113 of Income Tax Act, 1961, which levied surcharge on tax assessed in block assessments, is retrospective in nature or not.
0 comments Friday, October 3, 2014Read On
Rajasthan High Court in a very important case namely ACTO vs Jain Hardware Stores has held that no penalty can be levied in the provisional assessment as for leving penalty definite findings and conclusions and many things have to be proved, therefore penalty cannot be levied merely on the basis of provisional assessment.
Nobody is permitted to copy or publish the articles existing on this blog on any website or on any other media without my express permission.
No one is responsible for any claims if somebody finds that the information/opinions provided in this blog is incorrect and the blog is meant only to share knowledge and exchange views in a meaningful manner.
Powered by Blogger.