Showing posts with label Budget. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Budget. Show all posts
Proposed amendments in GST in Budget 20213 comments Wednesday, February 3, 2021Amendment in section 7-Scope of supply: Section of 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 deals with the scope
of supply. It defines supply in an inclusive manner. It is proposed to add
clause (aa) in sub-section 1 of section 7 which runs as under: “(aa)
the activities or transactions, by a person, other than an individual, to its
members or constituents or vice versa, for cash, deferred payment or other
valuable consideration.
Explanation.––For
the purposes of this clause, it is hereby clarified that, notwithstanding
anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or any
judgment, decree or order of any Court, tribunal or authority, the person and
its members or constituents shall be deemed to be two separate persons and the
supply of 77 activities or transactions inter se shall be deemed to take place
from one such person to another;”
The
above amendment seem to have been carried out to nulify the landmark judgement
of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Calcutta. Club Limited (2017) 5 SCC 356
wherein the court held that service tax need not be charged
by clubs for services to its members. The verdict was seen as also being
applicable in GST as GST has replaced service tax.
Now
after this amendment such transaction and activities will be covered by scope of
supply. It
is pertinent to mention here that along with this amendment simultaneously para
7 of Schedule II to CGST Act is also proposed to be omitted, which provided the
similar provisions which was deemed to be as supply even without consideration.
Now after the amendment the said activites are itself included in the
definition of scope of supply with a specific explanation overriding any other
law or judgement contrary to it. Amendment in section 16-Additional
condition for claiming ITC:
Section 16 of the CGST Act deals with the
conditions for claiming input tax credit by any person. An additional condition
is proposed to be added in section 16 which mandates that the invoice or debit
note on the basis of which credit is taken must be uploaded in GSTR-1 by the
supplier and the same should also have been communicated to the recipient in
terms of procedure laid down in section 37. The proposed amendment is as
follows:
“(aa)
the details of the invoice or debit note referred to in clause (a) has been
furnished by the supplier in the statement of outward supplies and such details
have been communicated to the recipient of such invoice or debit note in the
manner specified under section 37;”.
It
is pertinent to mention here that the proposed amendment seem to have been
added to provide a legal backing for Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, 2017, which
allows only 5% ITC in excess of eligible ITC available in respect of invoices
or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers in
GSTR-1 u/s 37(1) of CGST Act, if that be the case can it be said Rule 36(4)
till date is ultra vires of the Act, is a question which could be subject to
judicial scrutiny.
Amendment
in section 35 and 44-No requirement of GST audit:
Section 35(5) which mandated
for audit of annual accounts by a chartered accountant or cost accountant if
turnover exceeded prescribed limit, is proposed to be omitted. Now after the
amendment there will be no need of GST audit u/s 35(5). Section 44
simultaneously has also been proposed to be amended to provide that every
registered person shall file an annual return which may include a self certified
reconciliation statement, reconciling the value of supplies declared in the
return furnished for the financial year, with the audited annual financial
statement for every financial year electronically, within such time and in such
form and in such manner as may be prescribed.
The
time period earlier prescribed for filing annual return as 31st
December every year now is also proposed to be amended within such time as may
be prescribed.
Amendment in section 50-Interest only
on tax paid through cash ledger:
Section 50 is proposed to be amended to
provide that interest on tax payable in respect of supplies made during a tax
period and declared in the return for the said period furnished after the due
date in accordance with section 39 of
the Act, i.e. after the due date of GSTR-3B, shall
be payable on that portion of the tax which is paid by debiting the electronic
cash ledger.
In
nut shel the proposed amendment provide for levy on interest only on that part
of tax which is paid from the cash
ledger, if the return GSTR-3B is filed late.
This amendment is proposed wef 01.07.2017.
Similar amendment was also carried out in the Finance Act, 2019 however it was
made applicable wef 01.09.2020. Now, the same is done with retrospective
effect.
Amendment in section 75-change in
definition of self assessed tax:
Section
75(12) which provides for the recovery of self assessed tax which remains
unpaid as per GSTR-3b i.e. return filed u/s 39, is proposed to be amended to
add an explanation which defines the word self assessment tax.
The
proposed amendment defines self assessment tax as including the tax payable in respect of
details of outward supplies furnished u/s 37 but not included in a return
furnished u/s 39.
In other words the tax liability declared
in GSTR-1 but not declared in GSTR-3b will be considered as self assessed
tax u/s 75(12) and recovery of such tax can be initiated u/s 79 of CGST Act,
2017. It is pertinent to mention here that section 79 provides various modes of
recovery of tax including attachment of immovable property etc. Amendment
in section 129, 130 and 74: Section
129 of CGST Act which deals with detention, seizure and release of goods and
conveyance in transit has been amended
to a large extent.
Unamended
Section 129(1) provides that goods in
transit detained on the ground of their transportation in contravention
of the provisions of the Act or rules shall be released either
(a) on
100% payment of tax and penalty equal to 100% of tax payable in case of taxable
goods and 2% of value of goods or 25000 which ever is less where the owner
comes forward and (b) on
deposit of applicable tax along with 50% of value of goods and in case of
exempted goods in such case on deposit of 5% of value of exempted goods or
25000 whichever is less where the owner does not come forward
It is proposed to amend the above Clauses
(a) and (b) of section 129(1) to provide that goods shall be released
(a) on penalty of 200% of tax
payable on the goods in question, where owner comes forward
and
(b)on payment of penalty @
50% of the value of goods or 200% of tax payable whichever is higher, where the
owner does not come forward. The
word applicable tax has been omitted in the proposed amendment in both the
above clauses. However the proposed amendment would not result in any relief from
the amount payable under section 129 as with deltetion of the words applicable
tax, penalty amount has been doubled. The unamended provisions give an impression of
double taxation because not only applicable tax is supposed to be paid u/s 129
but also is required to be paid in the returns filed u/s 39, since the ITC of tax
paid u/s 129 is denied u/s 17(5) to the recipient, so in order to give ITC of
the applicable tax on goods in question one has to pay applicable tax again u/s
39 in the return filed by such person. After
the amendment only penalty is payable u/s 129(1)(a) or (b), which can be
further contested in appeal. Amendment in section 74: Consequent to the amendment in section
129(1)(a) and (b) a simultaneous amendment is made in section 74 so as to make
seizure and confiscation of goods and conveyances in transit a separate proceeding
from recovery of tax. No provisional release of goods
detained u/s 129 on bond: Sub-section
2 of section 129 is proposed to be omitted which provides for application of
section 67(6) to the goods detained u/s 129. Section 67(6) provides for
provisional release of goods seized upon execution of bond and furnishing of a
security or on payment of tax, interest
and penalty payable. Now after the
amendment there will no provisional release of goods u/s 129. Proceedings u/s 129 to be completed
within 14 days: Section
129(3) is also proposed to be amended so
as to provide that notice after detention or seizure will be issued within 7
days specifying the penalty payable and thereafter an order shall be passed within a period of seven
days from the date of service of notice for payment of penalty under clasue (a)
or clause (b) of section 129(1). Sub-section
6 of section 129 is also proposed to be amended to provide that if a person transporting the goods or owner of the goods fails to pay the amount of penalty u/s 129(1) within
fifteen days from the date of receipt of
order then goods or conveyance so detained or seized shall be liable to be sold
or disposed off in the manner and within the time prescribed. The
interesting thing in the amendment is that both goods and vehicle can be sold
or disposed off to realize the penalty amount in case of non payment, However
an option is proposed to be given to the transporter to get his conveyance released
on payment of Rs. 1 Lakh or penalty u/s 129(3) which ever is less. So
the proposed amendment in section 129(6) itself provide for a procedure for realization
of penalty instead of initiating proceedings u/s 130 Amendment in section 130: Consequent to amendment in section 129,
amendment in second proviso to section 130(2) is also made to provide for that the aggregate
amount of fine in lieu of confiscation and penalty shall not be less than 100% of
the tax payable on such goods, which in the pre-amended law is the amount equal
to the penalty payable u/s 129(1). Sub-section
3 of section 130 is also proposed to be omitted which makes the owner of the
goods liable for payment of tax, penalty or other charges payable in respect of
goods or conveyance confiscated. That means after the omission of sub section 3
only fine in lieu of confiscation and penalty which shall not be less than 100%
of the tax payable, will be payable u/s 130 where the goods are confiscated. Amendment in section 107-25%
pre-deposit in appeal against order u/s
129 : Amendment in section 83: Section 83 is amended so as to provide that
that whenever proceedings under chapter XII(Assessments) Chapter XIV(Inspection
, search and seizure) or Chapter XV(demand and recovery) are initiated the
Commissioner may for the purpose of protecting interest of the Govt Revenue may
provisionaly attach any propery belonging to any taxable person or any person
specified u/s 122(1A). In the unamended section attachment could be done only
during the pendency of proceedings u/s 62,64,67,73 or 74. Amendment in section 16 of IGST Act- There
is a proposal for a major amendment in section 16 of IGST Act. Section 16(3) of
IGST Act today provides that Export of goods or services can be done in two
ways One
With payment of IGST where refund is automatically given by customs Two
without payment of IGST where refund has to be applied of unutilized Input tax
credit Now
the proposed amendment provides that export of goods or services will be done
only without payment of IGST under a bond or LUT. It
is further provided in the proposed amendment that in case of non-realisation
of sale proceeds within the time limit as specified under The Foreign exchange
Management Act, 1999, the refund obtained would be deposited within 30 days along
with interest. It
is pertinent to mention here that recently a similar Rule 96B was introduced
vide Notification No 16/2020 Dated 23.03.2020. It seems this proposed amendment
u/s 16 is also introduced to give a legal backing to the Rule 96B. It is
strange that rules are introduced before the relevant amendment under the Act. Under
the proposed amendment it is further provided that export of goods or services
with payment of IGST will be made only by those class of persons or in case of
those class of goods, which are notified by the Government on the
recommendation of the GST Council.
All the proposed amendments in the GST
will be applicable from such date as the Central Government may by notification
appoint.
Some of the major changes proposed in the Union Budget 2016.2 comments Tuesday, March 1, 2016BUDGET 2016 PROPOSALS INCOME DECLARATION SCHEME 2016 · Government to bring Income Declaration Scheme 2016, to give opportunity to persons who have not paid full taxes in the past to come forward and declare their undisclosed income and pay tax. Scheme will start from 1st June 2016 and will remain open till date to be notified. Tax @ 30%, Surcharge @ 7.5% and penalty @ 7.5% (Total 45% ) will be charged by the Government on the undisclosed income. The tax will have to be paid on or before the date to be notified by the Central Govt. TAX RATES · No change in personal income tax slabs has been proposed. However Rebate of Rs.5000/- in tax will be allowed to individuals earning upto Rs.500000/- per year. Earlier this rebate was Rs.2000/-. PRESUMPTIVE TAXATION SCHEME · Turnover limit for Presumptive Taxation for Businesses has been increased from Rs.1 Crore to Rs. 2 Crore. Net Profit @ 8% will have to be declared in the Income Tax Return, if Sale is less than 2 Crores, otherwise Tax Audit will apply. Firms will have to declare income @ 8% of the Sales and pay tax on the same. Salary and interest to partners will not be allowed as deduction, as was being allowed earlier. · Any person paying tax under presumptive taxation scheme (section 44AD) will have to pay tax under the scheme for a continuous period of 5 years. If he opts out of the scheme during any year, then the option to pay tax on presumptive basis will not be allowed to him for next 5 years, and he will have to maintain proper books of accounts and get them audited during those 5 years. · Presumptive Tax introduced for Professionals like doctors, engineers, chartered accountants, architects. Professionals will have to declare income @ 50% of Gross receipts, otherwise will have to get the books of accounts audited. Tax Audit Limit for professionals increased to Rs. 50 lakhs.
ADVANCE TAX & RETURNS · Advance Tax will now have to be paid in four installments by all assessees – 15th June, 15th September, 15th December, 15th March. Earlier these installments were only for the Companies. · If Income Tax Return (in which Refund is due) is filed late, then department will not pay interest for the delayed period. · Now Income Tax Return can be filed only till one year from the end of the Financial Year. Earlier this limit was 2 years. · Income Tax Return which was filed after the due date could not be revised. Now the late filed return can also be revised if there is any mistake in the original return. · Earlier Dividends were exempt in the hands of the recipients. Now Dividend recipient will be liable to pay tax @ 10% if dividend received during the year is more than 10 lakhs. TDS/TCS · Threshold limit for deduction of TDS on Commission has been increased from Rs.5000/- to Rs.15000/-. TDS on Commission reduced from 10% to 5%. · Threshold limit for deduction of TDS on Contract (Section 194C) increased to Rs.100000/- per year from Rs.75000/-. · Recipients of Rental Income can also file Form 15G/15H for non deduction of TDS, if total income is below taxable limit. · TCS @ 1% introduced on Sale of any Goods or Services in Cash exceeding Rs.2 lakhs. If any Goods/Services are sold and payment is received in Cash exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs, then TCS will have to be collected from the person and paid to the government on monthly basis.
SERVICE TAX · Krishi Kalyan Cess @0.5% introduced. W.e.f. 1st June 2016, effective rate of service tax will be 15% (Service Tax 14%, Swach Bharat Cess 0.5%, Krishi Kalyan Cess @ 0.5%). · Annual Return of Service Tax introduced. Earlier there were only two half yearly returns of service tax. Now there will be three returns - 2 Half yearly and one annual. · Delayed payment of Service Tax, Interest @ 15% will have to be paid. However if Service Tax is collected but not paid to Government, then interest @ 24% will have to be paid Presumptive income scheme under budget 20162 comments
I. Amendments to section 44AD:
The existing provisions contained in the said section (applicable to individual, HUF or partnership firm) provides that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in section 28 to 43C, in the case of an assessee engaged in an eligible business having total turnover or gross receipts not exceeding one crore rupees, a sum equal to 8% of the total turnover or gross receipts, or, as the case may be, a sum higher than the aforesaid sum declared by the assessee in his return of income, shall be deemed to be the profits and gains of such business chargeable to tax under the head "Profit and gains of business or profession".
Further, under the existing scheme as per proviso to section 44AD(2), where the eligible assessee is a firm, the salary and interest paid to its partners shall be deducted from the income computed under sub-section (1) of section 44AD subject to the conditions and limits specified in section 40(b).
The Indirect Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016 - A Step Towards Resolving Pending Litigations1 comments
1.0 Introduction:
The Finance Bill, 2016 has proposed THE INDIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 for indirect tax disputes. The scheme is new to the indirect tax laws and is proposed to aimat resolving the litigations pending under the said Acts in a peacefull manner. The scheme is optional and provides relief to those litigants who want to buy peace of mind. The scheme is analysed as follows:
10 Big Tax-Related Announcements In Budget 20161 comments
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley did not change income tax slabs in his third Budget, but he did tweak some deductions and announced multiple new cesses, which will impact tax liability for the common man.
Here is a complete list of new tax measures announced in Budget 2016:
Interest earned from Recurring Deposit also subject to TDS2 comments Monday, March 2, 2015
The Finance Bill, 2015 has proposed to amend section 194-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 so as to levy TDS on recurring deposits as well. It is notable here that earlier TDS was applicable only on the interest earned in Fixed Deposits with the banks. Now interest earned from Recurring deposits will also be subject to TDS.
Proposed Amendments in TDS/TCS provisions-Budget, 20150 comments
The Finance Bill, 2015 proposes to rationalize the provisions of TDS and TCS under the IT Act. As such, the key proposals seek to bring parity between the TDS and TCS machinery provisions, resolve the uncertaintysurrounding taxation of interest payments by cooperative banks to members, strengthen TDS provisions relating to salary income and extend reporting requirements under section 195(6) of the IT Act to payments that are not chargeable to income tax.
Investment in Sukanya Samriddhi account also eligible for deduction u/s 80C0 comments
I. Introduction
In exercise of powers available under Section 80C(2)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), the Central Government had notified a scheme known as "SukanyaSamridhi Account Scheme" videNotification No. G.S.R. 863(E) dated 02-12-2014.
Under the scheme, an amount deposited as per the provisions of the scheme was eligible for deduction under section 80C and the interest earned on the scheme was taxable.
Relaxation from TDS u/s 194C restricted to only small transporters0 comments Sunday, March 1, 2015
Under the existing provisions of section 194C of the Act payment to contractors is subject to tax deduction at source (TDS)
at the rate of 1% in case the payee is an individual or Hindu undivided family and at the rate of 2% in case of other payees if such
payment exceeds Rs. 30,000 or aggregate of such payment in a financial year exceeds Rs. 75,000. Prior to 1.10.2009, section
194C of the Act provided for exemption from TDS to an individual transporter who did not own more than two goods carriage at
any time during the previous year. Subsequently, Finance (No.2) Act, 2009 substituted section 194C of the Act with effect from
1.10.2009, which inter alia provided for non- deduction of tax from payments made to the contractor during the course of plying,
hiring and leasing goods carriage if the contractor furnishes his Permanent Account Number (PAN) to the payer. No money above 20000 in cash, in relation to transfer of immovable property0 comments
The existing provisions contained in section 269SS of the Income-tax Act provide that no person shall take from any
person any loan or deposit otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft or online transfer through
a bank account, if the amount of such loan or deposit is twenty thousand rupees or more. However, certain exceptions have
been provided in the section. Similarly, the existing provisions contained in section 269T of the Income-tax Act provide that
any loan or deposit shall not be repaid, otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft or online
transfer through a bank account, by the persons specified in the section if the amount of loan or deposit is twenty thousand
rupees or more. Immovable properties held as stock in trade to be dealt in same terms as capital asset is dealt u/s 50C0 comments Monday, March 4, 2013Currently, when a capital asset, being immovable property, is transferred for a consideration which is less than the value adopted, assessed or assessable by any authority of a State Government for the purpose of payment of stamp duty in respect of such transfer, then such value (stamp duty value) is taken as full value of consideration under section 50C of the Income-tax Act. These provisions do not apply to transfer of immovable property, held by the transferor as stock-in-trade. Return of income filed without payment of self-assessment tax to be treated as defective return0 comments Sunday, March 3, 2013
Section 139(9) of Income Tax Act has been proposed to be amended in the Finance Bill 2013-14:
A. Existing provisions of section 139(9):
Under the existing provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a Return of Income is regarded as defective unless it fulfils all the conditions laid down in sub-section (9) of section 139 of the Act.
TDS on sale of immovable property of Rs. 50 lakh or more1 comments Friday, March 1, 2013
Clause 42 of the Finance Bill seeks to insert a new section 194-IA in the Income-tax Act relating to payment on transfer of certain immovable property other than agricultural land.
Definition of capital asset in respect of agriculture land changed0 comments
The provisions contained in clause (14) of the section 2 of Income Tax Act, 1961, define the term “capital asset” as property of any kind held by an assessee, whether or not connected with his business or profession. Certain categories of properties including agricultural land have been excluded from this definition.
Key highlights of Union budget 2013-140 comments
1.No revision in Tax slabs of Income Tax for individuals. A minor Tax credit of Rs.2,000 for whose income is up to Rs.5 lakh has been given (Rebate under Sec 87A).
2. Additional surcharge will be levied at 10% (other than Companies) whose income exceeds Rs 1 crore. Additional surcharges to be in force for only one year. Proposed income tax amendments in Budget 2012-13-Part-20 comments Monday, March 19, 2012Consideration in excess of F.M.V of shares to be treated as income from other source if consideration received is in excess of Face Value of shares: It is proposed to insert a new clause (viib) in the aforesaid sub-section so as to provide that where a company, not being a company in which the public are substantially interested, receives, in any previous year, from any person being a resident, any consideration for issue of shares that exceeds the face value of such shares, the aggregate consideration received for such shares as exceeds the fair market value of the shares shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head “Income from other sources”. However, the said new clause shall not apply where the consideration for issue of shares is received by a venture capital undertaking from a venture capital company or a venture capital fund. Proposed amendments in Budget 2012-13 in Taxation-Part 10 comments Saturday, March 17, 2012RATES OF INCOME-TAX after Budget 2012 presented on 16.03.2012 A. Normal Rates of tax:
Ceiling rate on Declared goods u/s 15 of CST Act is proposed to be increased from 4% to 5% in the Budget 2011-120 comments Tuesday, March 1, 2011It has been proposed in the Budget 2011-12 to increase the ceiling of 4% on declared goods under section 15 of CST Act to 5%. Currently State Governments cannot levy VAT more than 4% on declared goods. Declared goods are those goods which are of special importance and have been defined u/s 14 of CST Act 1956. This increase has been made in view of recent increase in the VAT slab rate of 4% to 5% by many states. Some Important changes in Income Tax after Budget 2011-120 comments Monday, February 28, 2011Rates of Income Tax : in the case of every individual or Hindu undivided family or every association of persons or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, or every artificial juridical person referred to in sub-clause (vii) of clause (31) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act Upto Rs. 1,80,000 Nil. Rs. 1,80,001 to Rs. 5,00,000 10 per cent. Rs. 5,00,001 to Rs. 8,00,000 20 per cent. Above Rs. 8,00,000 30 per cent. individual, being a woman resident in India, and below the age of sixty years Upto Rs. 1,90,000 Nil. Rs. 1,90,001 to Rs. 5,00,000 10 per cent. Rs.5,00,001 to Rs. 8,00,000 20 per cent. Above Rs. 8,00,000 30 per cent Senior citizen individual above 60 years of age but below than 80 years Upto Rs. 2,50,000 Nil. Rs. 2,50,001 to Rs. 5,00,000 10 per cent. Rs. 5,00,001 to Rs.8,00,000 20 per cent. Above Rs. 8,00,000 30 per cent. Senior citizen individual above 80 years of age Upto Rs. 5,00,000 Nil. Rs. 50,00,001 to Rs. 8,00,000 20 per cent. Above Rs. 8,00,000 30 per cent. No surcharge will be levied in the above cases B. Co-operative Societies In the case of co-operative societies, the rates of income-tax will continue to be the same as those specified for assessment year 2011-12. No surcharge will be levied . C. Firms In the case of firms, the rate of income-tax rate will continue to be the same as that specified for assessment year 2011-12. No surcharge will be levied . D. Local authorities The rate of income-tax in the case of every local will continue to be the same as that specified for the assessment year 2011-12. No surcharge will be levied. E. Companies The rates of income-tax in the case of companies will be the same as those specified for the assessment year 2011-12. The existing surcharge of seven and one-half per cent. on a domestic company is proposed to be reduced to five per cent. In case of companies other than domestic companies, the existing surcharge of two and one-half per cent. is proposed to be reduced to two per cent. However, the total amount payable as income-tax and surcharge on total income exceeding one crore rupees shall not exceed the total amount payable as income-tax on a total income of one crore rupees by more than the amount of income that exceeds one crore rupees. The existing surcharge of seven and one-half per cent. in all other cases (including sections 115JB, 115-O, 115R, etc.) isproposed to be reduced to five per cent. For financial year 2011-12, additional surcharge called the “Education Cess on income-tax” and “Secondary and Higher Education Cess on income-tax” shall continue to be levied at the rate of two per cent. and one per cent. respectively, on the amount of tax computed, inclusive of surcharge, in all cases. Definition of “charitable purpose Existing Definition: For the purposes of the Income-tax Act, “charitable purpose” has been defined in section 2(15) which, among others, includes “the advancement of any other object of general public utility”. However, “the advancement of any other object of general public utility” is not a charitable purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business, or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration,irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention, of the income from such activity and receipts from such activities is ten lakh rupees or more in the previous year. Proposed amendment: It is proposed to amend section 2(15) to enhance the current monetary limit in respect of receipts from such activities from ten lakhs rupees to twenty-five lakhs rupees. Effective date:This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st April, 2012 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessmentyear 2012-13 and subsequent years. Exemption of certain perquisites of Chairmen and Members of Union Public Service Commission The existing provisions of the Income-tax Act provide for the taxation of any perquisites or allowances received by an employee under the head "Salaries" unless it is specifically exempt under the Act. Currently, specified perquisites of the Chief Election Commissioner or Election Commissioner and the judges of the Supreme Court are exempt from taxation consequent to the enabling provisions in the respective Acts governing their service conditions. It is proposed to amend section 10 to extend similar benefit of exemption in respect of specific perquisites and allowances, which will be notified by the Central Government, received by both serving as well as retired Chairmen and Members of the Union Public Service Commission. This amendment is proposed to take effect retrospectively from 1st April, 2008 and will accordingly apply in relation to the assessment year 2008-09 and subsequent years. Exemption of specified income of notified body or authority or trust or board or commission It is proposed to insert a new clause in section 10 of the Income-tax Act to provide exemption from income-tax to any specified income of a body, authority, board, trust or commission which is set up or constituted by a Central, State or Provincial Act or constituted by the Central Government or a State Government with the object of regulating or administering an activity for the benefit of the general public, provided- (i) it is not engaged in any commercial activity, and (ii) is notified by the Central Government in this behalf. The nature and extent of income to be exempted will also be specified by the Central Government while notifying such entity. A consequential amendment is proposed in section 139 of the Act to provide for filing of the return of income by such notified entity. These amendments are proposed to take effect from 1st June 2011. Infrastructure Debt Fund In order to augment long-term, low cost funds from abroad for the infrastructure sector, it is proposed to facilitate setting up of dedicated debt funds. Section 10 of the Income-tax Act excludes certain incomes from the ambit of total income. It is proposed to amend section 10 of the Income-tax Act so as to provide enabling power to the Central Government to notify any infrastructure debt fund which is set up in accordance with the prescribed guidelines. Once notified, the income of such debt fund would be exempt from tax. It will, however, be required to file a return of income. It is also proposed to amend section 115A of the Income-tax Act to provide that any interest received by a non-resident from such notified infrastructure debt fund shall be taxable at the rate of five per cent. on the gross amount of such interest income. It is further proposed to insert a new section 194LB to provide that tax shall be deducted at the rate of five per cent. by such notified infrastructure debt fund on any interest paid by it to a non-resident. These amendments are proposed to take effect from 1st June 2011. Provisions relating to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) in case of Special Economic Zones Under the existing provisions of section 10AA of the Income-tax Act, a deduction of hundred per cent. Is allowed in respect of profits and gains derived by a unit located in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) from the export of articles or things or services for the first five consecutive assessment years; of fifty per cent. for further five assessment years; and thereafter, of fifty per cent. of the ploughed back export profit for the next five years. Further, under section 80-IAB of the Income-tax Act, a deduction of hundred per cent. is allowed in respect of profits and gains derived by an undertaking from the business of development of an SEZ notified on or after 1st April, 2005 from the total income for any ten consecutive assessment years out of fifteen years beginning from the year in which the SEZ is notified by the Central Government. Under the existing provisions of section 115JB(6), an exemption is allowed from payment of minimum alternate tax (MAT) on book profit in respect of the income accrued or arising on or after 1st April, 2005 from any business carried on, or services rendered, by an entrepreneur or a Developer, in a Unit or Special Economic Zone (SEZ), as the case may be. Further, under the existing provisions of section 115-O(6), an exemption is allowed from payment of tax on distributed profits [Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT)] in respect of the total income of an undertaking or enterprise engaged in developing or developing and operating or developing, operating and maintaining a Special Economic Zone for any assessment year on any amount declared, distributed or paid by such Developer or enterprise, by way of dividends (whether interim or otherwise) on or after 1st April, 2005 out of its current income. Such distributed income is also exempt from tax under section 10(34) of the Act. The above provisions were inserted in the Income-tax Act by the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 (SEZ Act) with effect from 10th February, 2006. Currently, there is no sunset date provided for exemption from MAT in the case of a developer of an SEZ or a unit located in an SEZ. Similarly, there is no sunset date for exemption from DDT in the case of a developer of an SEZ. It is proposed to sunset the availability of exemption from minimum alternate tax in the case of SEZ Developers and units in SEZs in the Income-tax Act as well as the SEZ Act. This amendment to section 115JB of the Income-tax Act will take effect from 1st April, 2012 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2012-13 and subsequent years. It is further proposed to discontinue the availability of exemption from dividend distribution tax in the case of SEZ Developers under the Income-tax Act as well as the SEZ Act for dividends declared, distributed or paid on or after 1st June, 2011. This amendment to section 115-O of the Income-tax Act will take effect from 1st June, 2011. It is also proposed to make consequential amendments by omitting Explanation to section 10(34) of the Income-tax Act. This amendment to section 10 will take effect from 1st June, 2011. Consequential amendments have also been proposed in the Second Schedule of the SEZ Act by omitting clause (C) of paragraph (a) [w.e.f. 01.06.2011], paragraph (h) [w.e.f. 01.04.2012] and paragraph (i) [w.e.f. 01.06.2011] of the Second Schedule. Tax benefits for New Pension System (NPS) Section 80CCD of the Income-tax Act provides, inter alia, a deduction in respect of contributions made by an employee as well as an employer to the New Pension System (NPS) account on behalf of the employee. In view of the provisions of section 80CCE, the aggregate deduction under sections 80C, 80CCC and 80CCD cannot exceed one lakh rupees. The allowable deduction under section 80CCD includes both the employee’s as well the employer’s contribution to the NPS. It is proposed to amend section 80CCE so as to provide that the contribution made by the Central Government or any other employer to a pension scheme under section 80CCD(2) shall be excluded from the limit of one lakh rupees provided under section 80CCE. Currently, the contribution made by an employer towards a recognised provident fund, an approved superannuation fund or an approved gratuity fund is allowable as a deduction from business income under section 36, subject to certain limits. However, the contribution made by an employer to the NPS is not allowed as a deduction. It is, therefore, proposed to amend section 36 so as to provide that any sum paid by the assessee as an employer by way of contribution towards a pension scheme, as referred to in section 80CCD(2) on account of an employee to the extent it does not exceed ten per cent. of the salary of the employee in the previous year, shall be allowed as deduction in computing the income under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”. These amendments are proposed to take effect from 1st April, 2012 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2012-13 and subsequent years. Deduction for investment in long-term infrastructure bonds Under the existing provisions of section 80CCF of the Income-tax Act, a sum of Rs. 20,000 (over and above the existing limit of Rs. 1 lakh available under section 80CCE for tax savings) is allowed as deduction in computing the total income of an individual or a Hindu undivided family if that sum is paid or deposited during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2011-12 in long-term infrastructure bonds as notified by the Central Government. It is proposed to amend section 80CCF to allow deduction on account of investment in notified long-term infrastructure bonds for the year 2011-12 (assessment year 2012-13) also. This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2012 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2012-13. Rationalisation of provisions relating to Transfer Pricing A. Section 92C of the Income-tax Act provides the procedure for computation of the Arm’s Length Price (ALP). The section provides the methods of computing the ALP and mandates that the most appropriate method should be chosen to compute ALP. It is also provided that if more than one price is determined by the chosen method, the ALP shall be taken to be the arithmetical mean of such prices. The second proviso to section 92C(2) provides that if the variation between the actual price of the transaction and the ALP, as determined above, does not exceed 5% of the actual price, then, no adjustment will be made and the actual price shall be treated as the ALP. A fixed margin of 5% across all segments of business activity and range of international transactions has out-lived its utility. It is, therefore, proposed to amend section 92C of the Act to provide that instead of a variation of 5%, the allowable variation will be such percentage as may be notified by Central Government in this behalf. This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st April, 2012 and it shall accordingly apply in relation to the Assessment Year 2012-13 and subsequent years. B. Section 92CA of the Act provides that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) can determine the ALP in relation to an international transaction, which has been referred to the TPO by the Assessing Officer. It is proposed to amend section 92CA so as to specifically provide that the jurisdiction of the Transfer Pricing Officer shall extend to the determination of the ALP in respect of other international transactions, which are noticed by him subsequently, in the course of proceedings before him. These international transactions would be in addition to the international transactions referred to the TPO by the Assessing Officer. C. Section 92CA(7) provides that for the purpose of determining the ALP, the TPO can exercise powers available to an assessing officer under section 131(1) and section 133(6). These are powers of summoning or calling for details for the purpose of inquiry or investigation into the matter. In order to enable the TPO to conduct on-the-spot enquiry and verification, it is proposed to amend section 92CA(7) so as to enable the TPO to also exercise the power of survey conferred upon an income-tax authority under section 133A of the Act. These amendments are proposed to take effect from 1st June 2011. D. Due date of return of Income for corporate assesses who are required file atransfer pricing report in Form 3CEB,extended to 30th November: Section 139 of the Income-tax Act stipulates 30th September of the assessment year as the due date for filing of return of income in case of corporate assessees. In addition to filing a return of income, assessees who have undertaken international transactions are also required (under the provisions of section 92E) to prepare and file a transfer pricing report in Form 3CEB before the due date for filing of return of income. Corporate assessees face practical difficulties in accessing contemporary comparable data before 30th September in order to furnish a report in respect of their international transactions. It is, therefore, proposed to amend section 139 to extend the due date for filing of return of income by such corporate assessees to 30th November of the assessment year. This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st April 2011. Toolbox of counter measures in respect of transactions with persons located in a notified jurisdictional area In order to discourage transactions by a resident assessee with persons located in any country or jurisdiction which does not effectively exchange information with India, anti-avoidance measures have been proposed in the Income-tax Act. It is proposed to insert a new section 94A in the Act to specifically deal with transactions undertaken with persons located in such country or area. The proposed section provides – 1) an enabling power to the Central Government to notify any country or territory outside India, having regard to the lack of effective exchange of information by it with India, as a notified jurisdictional area; 2) that if an assessee enters into a transaction, where one of the parties to the transaction is a person located in a notified jurisdictional area, then all the parties to the transaction shall be deemed to be associated enterprises and the transaction shall be deemed to be an international transaction and accordingly, transfer pricing regulations shall apply to such transactions; 3) that no deduction in respect of any payment made to any financial institution shall be allowed unless the assessee furnishes an authorization, in the prescribed form, authorizing the Board or any other income-tax authority acting on its behalf, to seek relevant information from the said financial institution; 4) that no deduction in respect of any other expenditure or allowance (including depreciation) arising from the transaction with a person located in a notified jurisdictional area shall be allowed under any provision of the Act unless the assessee maintains such other documents and furnishes the information as may be prescribed; 5) that if any sum is received from a person located in the notified jurisdictional area, then, the onus is on the assessee to satisfactorily explain the source of such money in the hands of such person or in the hands of the beneficial owner, and in case of his failure to do so, the amount shall be deemed to be the income of the assessee; 6) that any payment made to a person located in the notified jurisdictional area shall be liable to deduction of tax at the higher of the rates specified in the relevant provision of the Act or rate or rates in force or a rate of 30 per cent. This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st June, 2011. Taxation of certain foreign dividends at a reduced rate Under the existing provisions of the Income-tax Act, dividend received from foreign companies is taxable in the hands of the resident shareholder at his applicable marginal rate of tax. Therefore, in case of Indian companies which receive foreign dividend, such dividend is taxable at the rate of thirty per cent. plus applicable surcharge and cess. It is proposed to insert a new section 115BBD to provide that where total income of an Indian company for the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2012-13 includes any income by way of dividends received from a foreign subsidiary company, then such dividends shall be taxable at the rate of fifteen per cent. (plus applicable surcharge and cess) on the gross amount of dividends. No expenditure in respect of such dividends shall be allowed under the Act. This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st April, 2012 and will accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2012-13. Minimum Alternate Tax Under the existing provisions of section 115JB(1), a company is required to pay a minimum alternate tax (MAT) on its book profit, if the income-tax payable on the total income, as computed under the Act in respect of any previous year relevant to the assessment year commencing on or after 1st April, 2011, is less than the MAT. The amount of tax paid under the said section is allowed to be carried forward and set off against tax payable up to the tenth assessment year immediately succeeding the assessment year in which the tax credit becomes allowable under the provisions of section 115JAA. It is proposed to amend this section to increase the rate of MAT to eighteen and one-half per cent. from the existing rate of eighteen per cent. of such book profit. This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2012 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2012-13 and subsequent years. Alternate Minimum Tax for Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (LLP) has come into effect in 2009. The LLP has features of both a body corporate as well as a traditional partnership. The Income-tax Act provides for the same taxation regime for a limited liability partnership as is applicable to a partnership firm. It also provides tax neutrality (subject to fulfilment of certain conditions) to conversion of a private limited company or an unlisted public company into an LLP. An LLP being treated as a firm for taxation, has the following tax advantages over a company under the Income-tax Act:- i) it is not subject to Minimum Alternate Tax; ii) it is not subject to Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT); and iii) it is not subject to surcharge. In order to preserve the tax base vis-Ã -vis profit-linked deductions, it is proposed to insert a new Chapter XII-BA in the Income-tax Act containing special provisions relating to certain limited liability partnerships. Under the proposed amendment, where the regular income-tax payable for a previous year by a limited liability partnership is less than the alternate minimum tax payable for such previous year, the adjusted total income shall be deemed to be the total income of such limited liability partnership and it shall be liable to pay income-tax on such total income at the rate of eighteen and one-half per cent. For the purpose of the above, (i) “adjusted total income” shall be the total income before giving effect to this newly inserted Chapter XII-BA as increased by the deductions claimed under any section included in Chapter VI-A under the heading “C –Deductions in respectof certain incomes” and deduction claimed under section 10AA; (ii) “alternate minimum tax” shall be the amount of tax computed on adjusted total income at a rate of eighteen and one-half per cent; and (iii) “regular income-tax” shall be the income-tax payable for a previous year by a limited liability partnership on its totalincome in accordance with the provisions of the Act other than the provisions of this newly inserted Chapter XII-BA. It is further provided that the credit for tax (tax credit) paid by a limited liability partnership under this newly inserted Chapter XII-BA shall be allowed to the extent of the excess of the alternate minimum tax paid over the regular income-tax. This tax credit shall be allowed to be carried forward up to the tenth assessment year immediately succeeding the assessment year for which such credit becomes allowable. It shall be allowed to be set off for an assessment year in which the regular income-tax exceeds the alternate minimum tax to the extent of the excess of the regular income-tax over the alternate minimum tax. This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st April, 2012 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2012-13 and subsequent years. Collection of information on requests received from tax authorities outside India Under the existing provisions of section 131(1) of the Income-tax Act, certain income-tax authorities have been conferred the same powers as are available to a Civil Court while trying a suit in respect of discovery and inspection, enforcing the attendance of any person, including any officer of a banking company and examining him on oath, compelling production of books of account and other documents and issuing commissions. It is proposed to facilitate prompt collection of information on requests received from tax authorities outside India in relation to an agreement for exchange of information under section 90 or section 90A of the Income-tax Act. Accordingly, it is proposed to insert sub-section (2) in section 131. The new sub-section provides that for the purpose of making an enquiry or investigation in respect of any person or class of persons in relation to an agreement referred to in section 90 or section 90A, it shall be competent for any income-tax authority, not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, as notified by the Board in this behalf, to exercise the powers currently conferred on income-tax authorities referred to in section 131(1). The authority so notified by the Board shall be able to exercise the powers under section 131(1) notwithstanding that no proceedings with respect to such person or class of persons are pending before it or any other income-tax authority. It is further proposed to amend section 131(3) so as to empower the aforesaid authority, as notified by the Board, to impound and retain any books of account and other documents produced before it in any proceeding under the Act. Similar amendments have also been proposed in section 133 of the Income-tax Act. These amendments will take effect from 1st June, 2011. Exemption to a class or classes of persons from furnishing a return of income Under the existing provisions contained in section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, every person, if his total income during the previous year exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, is required to furnish a return of his income. In the case of salaried tax payer, entire tax liability is discharged by the employer through deduction of tax at source. Complete details of such tax payers are also reported by the employer through Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) statements. Therefore, in cases where there is no other source of income, filing of a return is a duplication of existing information. In order to reduce the compliance burden on small tax payer, it is proposed to insert sub-section (1C) in section 139. This provision empowers the Central Government to exempt, by notification in the Official Gazette, any class or classes of persons from the requirement of furnishing a return of income, having regard to such conditions as may be specified in that notification. Consequential amendments are also proposed to be made to the provisions of section 296 to provide that any notification issued under section 139(1C) shall be laid before Parliament. These amendments will take effect from 1st June, 2011. Extension of time limit for assessments in case of exchange of information Section 153 of the Income-tax Act provides for the time limits for completion of assessments and reassessments. In Explanation 1 to section 153 of the Income-tax Act, certain periods specified therein are to be excluded while computing the period of limitation for completion of assessments and reassessments. It is proposed to exclude the time taken in obtaining information from the tax authorities in jurisdictions situated outside India, under an agreement referred to in section 90 or section 90A, from the statutory time limit prescribed for completion of assessment or reassessment. Accordingly, it is proposed to insert a new clause (viii) in Explanation 1 to section 153. It provides that the period commencing from the date on which a reference for exchange of information is made by an authority competent under an agreement referred to in section 90 or section 90A and ending with the date on which the information so requested is received by the Commissioner, or a period of six months, whichever is less, shall be excluded. Similar amendments are proposed to be made to section 153B of the Income-tax Act. These amendments will take effect from 1st June, 2011. Modification in the conditions for filing an application before the Settlement Commission The existing provisions contained in the proviso to section 245C(1) allow an application to be made before the Settlement Commission if,— (i) the proceedings have been initiated against the applicant under section 153A or under section 153C as a result of search or a requisition of books of account, as the case may be, and the additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the application exceeds fifty lakh rupees; (ii) in other cases, if the additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the application exceeds ten lakh rupees. It is proposed to expand the criteria for filing an application for settlement by a tax payer in whose case proceedings have been initiated as a result of search or requisition of books of account. It is, therefore, proposed to insert a new clause (ia) in the proviso to section 245C(1). This stipulates that an application can also be made, where the applicant— (a) is related to the person [referred to in (i) above] in whose case proceedings have been initiated as a result of search and who has filed an application; and (b) is a person in whose case proceedings have also been initiated as a result of search, the additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in his application exceeds ten lakh rupees. As a consequence, a tax payer who is the subject matter of a search would be allowed to file an application for settlement if additional income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the application exceeds fifty lakh rupees. Entities related to such a tax payer, who are also the subject matter of search, would now be allowed to file an application for settlement, if additional income-tax payable in their application exceeds ten lakh rupees. The relationship between the person who makes an application under clause (ia) of the proviso to section 245C(1) and the person mentioned in clause (i) of the proviso is defined by inserting an Explanation in the section. This amendment will take effect from 1st June, 2011. Power of the Settlement Commission to rectify its orders The existing provisions of section 245D(4) of the Income-tax Act provide that the Settlement Commission may pass an order, as it thinks fit, on the matters covered by the applications received by it, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the applicant and to the Commissioner. Further, under section 245F(1), the Settlement Commission has been conferred all the powers which are vested in an income-tax authority under the Act. An income-tax authority has the power (under section 154) to amend any order passed by it for the purpose of rectifying any mistake apparent from the record. It is proposed to insert a new sub-section (6B) in section 245D so as to specifically provide that the Settlement Commission may, at any time within a period of six months from the date of its order, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it under section 245D(4). It is further provided that a rectification which has the effect of modifying the liability of the applicant shall not be made unless the Settlement Commission has given notice to the applicant and the Commissioner of its intention to do so and has allowed the applicant and the Commissioner an opportunity of being heard. Consequential amendments on similar lines are proposed to be made to section 22D of the Wealth Tax Act. These amendments will take effect from 1st June, 2011. Share |
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
Featured PostTCS to apply only on cash portion of sales transaction CBDT clarifiesWelcome clarification by CBDT on TCS on Cash Sale. CBDT vide Circular No. 23/2016 dt. 24 June 2016 has clarified on FAQs of stakeholde... AddThisShareThisGet updates via email, just subscribe below and click on activation link afterwards in your emailCategory
Right consultancy at right time avoids unnecessary litigation.
Popular Posts
FollowersAbout Me
FeedjitBlog Archive
WARNING
Nobody is permitted to copy or publish the articles existing on this blog on any website or on any other media without my express permission. Total PageviewsDisclaimer
No one is responsible for any claims if somebody finds that the information/opinions provided in this blog is incorrect and the blog is meant only to share knowledge and exchange views in a meaningful manner.
Useful Links
Powered by Blogger.
|