Read On
Scrutiny, audit, assessment processes under Punjab VAT to be handed over to external agencies0 comments Saturday, September 15, 2012Excise & Taxation Department, Punjab is looking forward to handover the scrutiny, audit and assessment process in the hands of some external agency for a limited period of 8 months to 1 year till the time the new system i.e. Compuerisation of Tax Information System (COTIS) is fully implemented.
Transactions through MCX stock exchange are non-speculative after 01-04-20060 commentsMumbai ITAT has held that the transactions carried out through MCX Stock Exchange after 1st April 2006, would be eligible for being treated as non-speculation within the meaning of clause (d) of proviso to section 43(5). It is held by ITAT in this case as follows : No TDS on discount given to Stamp Vendors for purchasing stamps in bulk quantity0 comments Tuesday, September 11, 2012The assessee, an association of stamp vendors, bought stamps from the State Govt. at a discount. The department claimed that the stamp vendors were “agents” of the State Govt. and that the said discount was “commission or brokerage” and the State Govt. ought to deduct TDS u/s 194H. The assessee filed a Writ Petition to challenge the department’s action. The Gujarat High Court upheld the assessee’s plea that (a) title in the stamps passed to the vendors and that they were not “agents” of the State Govt. but were transacting on a “principal to principal” basis and (b) the discount available to the stamp vendors was not “commission or brokerage” so as to fall within s. 194H. On appeal by the department to the Supreme Court, HELD dismissing the appeal: Lower/Nil rate of tax deduction certificate for works contractors under Punjab VAT Act, 20050 comments
It is ussualy seen that works contractors registered under
Punjab VAT Act, 2005 have always refund to claim from the Excise & Taxation
department due to the fact that their final tax liability is much lower/Nil
than the tax deductions made u/s 27 of Punjab VAT Act, 2005. It results in
blocking of their working capital till the time they get refund from the
Department.The solution to it is to resort to section 27(10) of Punjab VAT Act,
2005.
The relevant provisions of PVAT Act 2005 and certain relevant judgements have been discussed herebelow in this regard
Processing fee levied on all VAT dealers, luxury tax, lump sum tax on brick klins doubled in Punjab0 comments Wednesday, September 5, 2012Excise & taxation Department, Punjab has levied processing fee of Rs. 800 on every taxable dealer (i.e Person having VAT registration) in Punjab under a new Rule 40-A of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005. This rule provides as under: "Every taxable person shall pay annual processing fee of Rs. Eight Hundred only during the month of October alongwith the filing of quarterly return. This processing fee is in lieu of operation, maintenance and upgradation of such facilities and services as electronic issuance of statutory forms, e-filing of returns, e-payment of taxes and such other online and offline services being rendered or proposed to be rendered by the Excise and Taxation Department." House lacking basic amenities does not qualify for exemption u/s 540 commentsIn the instant case, in order to examine the entitlement of the assessee for exemption under section 54, it is to be seen whether the assessee had constructed residential house within three years of the transfer of his property. For doing so, the meaning of the term ‘house’ is to be explored. The term ‘house’ has not been given any statutory definition and, thus, has to be assigned meaning as understood in common parlance. As per dictionary, it means abode, a dwelling place or building for human habitation. A building, in order to be habitable by a human being, is ordinarily required to have minimum facilities of washroom, kitchen, electricity, sewerage, etc. Powers u/s 8(3) of PVAT Act should be exercised in exceptional circumstances0 comments Monday, September 3, 2012
Section 8(3) of Punjab VAT Act, 2005 provides that a prior 15 days notice is required to be issued by notification of intention to amend the schedules, before any schedules are amended. However the State Government may also dispense with the requirement of issuance of the prior notice if the circumstances so exist. Section 8(3) runs as under: Notifications relating to VAT increase by 0.5% in Punjab0 comments
Punjab Government has increased the VAT rate by 0.5% on almost all goods under Punjab VAT Act, 2005 for which a public notice was issued earlier in the newspapers. Now the official notifications are available and sharing the same herebelow for the benefit of all concerneds. VAT rate in Punjab increased by 0.5% w.e.f 03-09-20120 comments Sunday, September 2, 2012Punjab Government has increased the rate of VAT on all goods in Punjab by 0.5% under the Punjab VAT Act, 2005 w.e.f 03-09-2012. Thus the rate of tax on all the goods stand increased by 0.5% w.e.f 03-09-2012. For example in case of goods mentioned under Schedule B rate of tax would be now @ 5.5% and after adding surcharge @ 10% the rate of tax would be 6.05%. Punjab's traders may move HC against processing fee, e-TRIP0 comments Saturday, September 1, 2012
Traders in Punjab are mulling approaching the High Court against the state government's decision to levy new processing fee and e-TRIP system. "We are going to have a meeting soon in which the trading community and various industry associations will participate to collectively decide about next course of action which may also include approaching the (Punjab and Haryana) High Court, having protest rallies against the processing fee and e-TRIP," Punjab Pradesh Beopar Mandal, President, Amrit Lal Jain told PTI today. "We are already in touch with prominent High Court lawyers to give their opinion on how to go about against processing fee and e-TRIP," Mandals Secretary, Mohinder Aggarwal said.
Clarification-service tax on vocational education/training course0 comments Wednesday, August 29, 2012Circular No. 164/15/2012-ST, New Delhi, 28th August, 2012 Subject: service tax – vocational education/training course — regarding. Clarification has been sought in respect of levy of service tax on certain vocational education/training/ skill development courses (VEC) offered by the Government (Central Government or State Government) or local authority themselves or by an entity independently established by the Government under the law, as a society or any other similar body. Doctor's remuneration to suffer TDS u/s 192 and not 194J, if he is governed by service rules of employer0 comments Sunday, August 26, 2012
ITAT Ahemdabad in DCIT vs Wockhardt Hospitals Ltd. has held that Where assessee-hospital engaged some doctors on fixed monthly remuneration, and doctors were governed by its service rules, remuneration paid was taxable as 'salaries' and liable for deduction of tax under section 192. In this case the assessee-company was running hospital with branches. It had engaged services of some doctors and was deducting TDS from payments made to them under section 194J. According to the assessee, the doctors were appointed as consultants whose remuneration was liable for TDS under section 194J and there was no employer and employee relationship. The Assessing Officer, however, treated the relationship between the doctors and the assessee as one of employer and employee and held that said payments were liable to TDS under section 192. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the assessee's appeal. On the revenue's appeal it was held as under: No reopening in the absense of tangible material even when only intimation u/s 143(1) was issued originaly0 comments Friday, August 24, 2012Gujrat High Court in Inductotherm (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT has held that reopening of aseessment u/s 147/148 would be invalid when no new material has come before the AO even when no assessment u/s 143(3) was framed earlier but only an intimation u/s 143(1)(a) was issued. In this case: For AY 2002-03, the AO issued an Intimation u/s 143(1) accepting the return. Subsequently, based on objections raised by the audit, he issued a s. 148 notice to reopen the assessment. The AO set out four issues in the recorded reasons and for two he stated that the reopening was to “verify” the expenditure. The assessee filed a Writ Petition to challenge the reopening inter alia on the ground that there was no reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. E-trip in Punjab-is it valid?0 comments Monday, August 20, 2012Excise and Taxation Department, Punjab has made it mandatory to furnish information regarding intra-state movement of goods (within Punjab) by all persons making sales of Rs. 3 Lakh or above in a single transaction except in the case of Iron and Steel where this threshold shall be Rs. 2 Lakh instead of Rs. 3 Lakh and above.
This mandatory uploading of intra-state transaction has been made compulsory by merely a public notice. Works contract services provided by sub-contractor in exempt works contract services, exempt from service tax0 comments Friday, August 17, 2012
Recently I received a query that under the negative list of services regime whether in a works contract service which is exempt from service tax, sub-contractor would also be exempted from payment of service tax?
The answer to the above question is being provided under serial No. 29 sub-clause (h) of the mega Notification, which provides that service provided by following person in respective capacities are exempt from service tax : (h) sub-contractor providing services by way of works contract to another contractor providing works contract services which are exempt[Notification No. 25/2012-ST, dated 20.06.2012] The above entry makes it clear that if the principal contractor is providing an exempt works contract service [for example providing works contract service to Government] then in such case if some part of the works contract is sub-contracted then the sub-contractor would also be exempt from payment of service tax. Deduction u/s 54F available even if flat purchased in daughter's name0 comments Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Briefly the facts are during the relevant previous year, the assessee has sold 1,10,000 shares for a consideration of Rs.96,36,519. Out of sale consideration of shares, the assessee invested a sum of Rs.55,68,662/- for purchasing a flat in the name of his minor daughter. The assessee claimed the amount invested in purchase of flat as a deduction u/s 54F (1) of the Act. The AO disallowed the deduction claimed on the ground that the flat was not purchased by the assessee in his own name. The AO relying upon different High Courts’ decisions and also a decision of ITAT, Nagpur Bench in case of ITO vs. Prakash Timaji Dhanjode 258 ITR (AT) 0114 held that the assessee is not entitled for deduction u/s 54F(i). Assessee being aggrieved by the assessmentorder filed an appeal before the CIT (A). Since the AR of the assessee or no one appeared before the CIT (A) on the last date fixed on 28-11-2011 the appeal was decided by the CIT (A) on the basis of statement of facts and grounds of appeal filed before him. The CIT (A) upheld the reasoning of the AO that since the property was purchased in the name of the assessee’s doughter and not in the name of the assessee himself, no deduction u/s 54F can be allowed.
Income from other sources included in P&L A/c to be considered for calculating Book Profits for the purpose of section 40(b)(v)0 comments Monday, August 6, 2012
Calcutta High court in Serajudding & Brothers vs CIT has held that Even if the income from other sources is included in the profit and loss accounts to ascertain the net profit in relation to book-profit for computation of the remuneration of the partners u/s 40(b)(v) the same cannot be discarded.
It means that book profits for the purpose of calculating remuneration of partners in a partnership firm u/s 40(b)(v) will include income from other sources as well if the same has been included in the Profit & Loss Account. In such case not the profits computed under the head Business alone to be considered as Book Profits for the purpose of section 40(b)(v) but other income included in P&L A/c has also to be considered as part of Book Profits for the purpose of section 40(b)(v).
CBDT clarifies, extended due date of 31-08-2012 applies to all returns which were due to be filed by 31-07-20120 comments Wednesday, August 1, 2012The CBDT has issued the following Press Release dated 01.08.2012
PRESS RELEASE [No. 402/92/2006-MC (20 of 2012)], dated 1-8-2012 A section of Media has reported that the Central Board of Direct Taxes has extended ‘due date’ of filing of returns to 31st August, 2012 in respect of only those returns which were to be e-filed by 31st July, 2012. It is clarified that the notification issued by the Board on 31st July, 2012 has extended the ‘due date’ of filing of all returns for the Assessment Year 2012-13 which were due to be filed by 31st July, 2012 to 31st August, 2012. Get ready to pay professional tax in Punjab0 comments
The Punjab government, which is expecting to mop up Rs 500 crore by imposing a tax on the self-employed and salaried professionals, is looking up to Bihar to finalise the modalities. Bihar, governed by Nitish Kumar-led JDU-BJP combine imposed the professional tax in September last year and fund-starved SAD-BJP government in Punjab, led by Parkash Singh Badal, has decided to follow suit.
Punjab will be the tenth state to tax the professionals and, following the Bihar model, will be charging Rs 1,000 to Rs 2,500 depending on the salary of the employed. The slab, incidentally is one of the highest in comparison to the tax imposed in other states.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
Featured PostTCS to apply only on cash portion of sales transaction CBDT clarifiesWelcome clarification by CBDT on TCS on Cash Sale. CBDT vide Circular No. 23/2016 dt. 24 June 2016 has clarified on FAQs of stakeholde... AddThisShareThisGet updates via email, just subscribe below and click on activation link afterwards in your emailCategory
Right consultancy at right time avoids unnecessary litigation.
Popular Posts
FollowersAbout Me
FeedjitBlog Archive
WARNING
Nobody is permitted to copy or publish the articles existing on this blog on any website or on any other media without my express permission. Total PageviewsDisclaimer
No one is responsible for any claims if somebody finds that the information/opinions provided in this blog is incorrect and the blog is meant only to share knowledge and exchange views in a meaningful manner.
Useful Links
Powered by Blogger.
|