Clarifications on E-trip and E-icc0 comments Sunday, September 15, 2013
The Commissioner Excise and Taxation Punjab has issued a clarificaton that "Goods and Materials obtained from cutting of old ships and boats" as well as the :heavy melting scrap" are covered under the entry "irobn and steel" for the purposes of E-trip.
It also has been clarified that only the goods covered in order dated 17-07-2013 relating to e-trip and e-icc are the only goods for e-trip and e-icc needs to be done. Overview of E-trip and E-ICC under Punjab VAT Act, 20051 comments Monday, September 2, 2013
What is E-Trip and E-ICC: E-trip and E-ICC has come into force w.e.f 01-08-2013 in Punjab. E-trip is the reporting of intra-state and E-ICC is the reporting of inter-state transactions meant for trade under section 51 of Punjab VAT Act. 2005 on the virtual information collection centre on the official website of the Excise & Taxation Department, Punjab i.e www.pextax.com.
E-trip and E-ICC have been implemented under Rule 64-A, 64-B and 64-C read with Rule 2(hh) of the Punjab VAT Rules, 2005. Although such E-trip and E-ICC system has been implemented w.e.f 01-08-2013 but by public notice dated 01-08-2013(Public notice of 01-08-2013 can be downloaded at the link available at the end of this article) the dealers were allowed time for upgrading their system for the purpose of e-trip till 01-09-2013 and till that time it was assured that no penalty will be levied u/s 51 for not doing E-trip or E-ICC. Since 01-09-2013 has arrived therefore certain following points relating to E-trip and E-ICC are discussed heerbelow for the all concernds: When E-Trip is required to be done: E-Trip is required to be done not in all transactions of movement of goods within State but in case of transactions of specified goods of specified monetary limit only. Since E-trip is a reporting of intra-state movement oof goods within State on the virtual information collection centre i.e a compliance u/s 51 of the Punjab VAT Act, 2005 therefore only those transactions of intra-state movement of goods within State is required to be reported under E-trip system, which are meant for business only, as section 51 has applicability only in relation to transactions which are meant for Business. Thus if an intra-state transaction is meant for personal use and not for business and trade then E-trip of such transaction would not be required. Specified Goods and monetary limits in which E-trip is required:
It has been clarified in Public Notice dated 01-08-2013 that “Forging and Casting” items are not included in the item “Iron & Steel” specified under Rule 64-A and 64-B. After reporting the transaction under E-trip in form VAT-12-A, an electronic receipt would be generated which mandatorily needs to be carried along with the goods during their movement within State. E-Trip is required to be done before putting the goods in transit within the State. Any transaction covered by multiple invoices with total value of all invoices exceeding the prescribed threshold, where the consignor & the consignee are the same and the goods are transported through the same vehicle shall be considered a single transaction for the purpose of minimum sale. Maximum transition time prescribed under Rule 64-A: Rule 64-A(3) of Punjab VAT Rules gives power to Commissioner to specify maximum transition time for delivery of specified goods from one destination to the other destination. The maximum transition time has been prescribed as below:
It has been further clarified in Public Notice dated 01-08-2013 that in case goods are being transported through a transporter, the requirements of e-Trip/e-ICC will not be applicable when the goods are being transported from the premises of the dealer to the transporter. In this case, these requirements shall be applicable when the movement of the goods starts from the premises of the transporter. When E-ICC is required to be done: Reporting of inter-state transaction on the virtual information collection centre by a system of E-ICC is required to be done in two cases i.e in case of export of goods outside the state of Punjab and other is import of goods into the State of Punjab from outside by air, railway or dry port. E-ICC in case of export of goods outside the State:Rule 64-B deals with the procedure for furnishing information under E-ICC system relating to export of goods outside the State of Punjab by any mode of transition. An owner or person incharge of the specified goods before putting the same into transit for export out of the State, for trade or commerce by any mode of transition has to report the information relating to such export on the virtual ICC in form VAT-12. The specified goods for the purpose of E-ICC in case of export of goods outside the State are as follows:
It has been clarified in Public Notice dated 01-08-2013 that “Forging and Casting” items are not included in the item “Iron & Steel” specified under Rule 64-A and 64-B. Thus E-ICC is applicable only on the goods and monetary limits of a bill specified for this purpose as mentioned in the above table.In case of other goods or specified goods where bill value is less than the monetary limit of Rs. 50000/- , there is no need for need for reporting the transaction on E-ICC, rather the same will be recorded at the Information Collection Centre established at the borders of Punjab as and when goods reach such ICC. It has also been clarified in public notice dated 01-08-2013 that any transaction covered by multiple invoices with total value of all invoices exceeding the prescribed thresh-hold, where the consignor & the consignee are the same and the goods are transported through the same vehicle shall be considered a single transaction for the purpose of minimum sale. Maximum transition time for E-ICC: The maximum transition time for delivery of goods from place of departure to the nearest ICC falling enroute towards destination while exiting the State has been specified as under:
However it should be noted that it has been clarified in public notice dated 01-08-2013 that for the goods being sent outside the State i.e. goods covered under Rule 64-B, the condition of maximum time limit to leave the State shall not apply.
E-ICC in case of import of goods into State of Punjab: If a person imports any goods into the State of Punjab either by air or railways or by dry ports then as per Rule 64-C he needs mandatorily to report the said transaction on the virtual ICC in form VAT-12, before taking the delivery of such goods or before transition of such goods by road, whichever is earlier. That means import of all goods by railway or air or by dry port will have to be reported on E-ICC and such reporting will have to be done before taking the delivery of such goods or before transition of such goods by road, whichever is earlier. It should be noted that E-ICC system is applicable on the specified goods and monetary limit in case of Rule 64-B, but in case of Rule 64-C system of E-ICC is applicable on all the goods irrespective of nature of goods or the monetary limit. username and passwords for E-ICC and E-trip: If a person wants to start reporting on E-ICC, he will have to get username and password for the same from the local jurisdictional officer. After getting the same, one can log on to the website of the Department i.e. www.pextax.com at the links available for E-ICC. For E-Trip the user name is the TIN of the person and the password which is now working seems to be the old password for the efiling of returns which was used by such person before migrating its TIN on a new system namely COTIS as existing on the new website. However it has been clarified by the Department on a public notice dated 01-08-2013 that Transporters will be able to submit data on behalf of the dealers on the website of the department. ITC on capital goods not to be reduced to 4% when tax on the same is paid at 12.5%-Punjab VAT Tribunal0 comments Friday, August 30, 2013
Punjab VAT Tribunal has held in L.S. Rice Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Punjab (2013) 45 PHT 597 (PVT) that reduction of input tax credit on capital goods from 12.5% to 4% when the purchases made by the assessee are on 12.5% is not sustainable. So the assessee is entitled to full ITC.
Notice for reassessment u/s 147 can be issued only after time limit for issuing notice u/s 143(2) has expired0 comments Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Amritsar ITAT has held in DCIT vs Mangat Ram that jurisdiction under section 147 can be acquired only after limitation to issue notice under section 143(2) has expired.
In this case it has been held by the ITAT that The Assessing Officer cannot acquire two jurisdictions to issue notice
under section 148 as well as under section 143(2), especially when there
is a time left for issuing notice under section 143(2) with respect to
the original return filed by the assessee on 13-3-2008.
Statement of Object and reasons behind Etrip in Punjab now disclosed by the Governement0 comments Sunday, August 18, 2013
Few days back I had written an
article namely “Etrip in Punjab-an Uncontrolled delegated legislation” in which
I had raised a point that while giving discretionary power to the Commissioner
to specify the goods for the purpose of Etrip certain policy should or
guidelines should have been laid down according to which the Commissioner has
to exercise its power to specify the goods for the purpose of Etrip under Rule
2(hh) read with rule 64-A and rule 64-B of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005.
Claim of entry tax deemed as advance tax under Punjab VAT Act not to be conditional2 comments
Introducton: Entry Tax is a tax levied under the Punjab Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2000. It is levied u/s 3-A of the said Act on a dealer who is bringing the goods into local areas of Punjab.
Entry tax can be claimed as input tax credit by a person paying such entry tax against his output tax liability. However such claim of input tax credit of entry tax is available subject to the conditions mentioned u/s 13-A of the Punjab VAT Act, 2005. Section 13-A runs as under
"Subject to the provisions of this Act, a taxable person shall be entitled to input tax credit in respect of the tax, paid by him under the Punjab Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2000, if such goods are for sale in the State or in the cource of inter-state trade or commerce or in the cource of export or for use in manufacture, processing or packing of taxable goods for sale within the State or in the cource of inter-state trade or commerce or in the cource of export."
Thus claim of entry tax as input tax credit u/s 13-A is available only in the circumstances mentioned above in the section. As per the provisons of section 13-A if a person pays entry tax on raw material to be used in the manufacturing of tax free goods, his claim of entry tax as input tax credit will be restricted.
However it is notable here that the provisions of section 13-A of the Punjab VAT Act, 2005 are not a complete code in it self as non-abstante clause is missing therein, infact the provisons of section 13-A are subject to the other provisions of the Act.
Position after entry tax deemed as advance tax: A very important change has been brought about the status of entry tax under the Punjab VAT Act, 2005 after the introduction of the provisions contained in sub-section (7) and (8) of section 6 the said Act w.e.f 12-08-2011, which needs to be understood before giving the input tax credit of entry tax paid.
Provisions of section 6(7) and 6(8) runs as under:
(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) to sub-section (6), the State Government shall charge the tax in advance on the import of goods to be notified in such manner, as may be precribed, and at such rates, as may be notified, but not exceeding the rates applicable on such goods under this Act:
PROVIDED THAT such goods are meant for sale or use in manufacturing or processing of any goods for sale: PROVIDED FURTHER THAT such tax collected in advance, shall be counted towards final liability of the taxable person at the end of each tax paid. (8) The tax collected under the Punjab Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2000(Punjab Act No. 9 of 2000), shall be deemed to have been collected under the provisions of sub-section (7). A new incidence of taxation (that too with a non-abstante clause i.e irrespective of the taxable quantum of a person) has been created u/s 6(7) which is called as advance tax to be levied on the import of goods. Whether such advance tax is within the purview of the Entry 54 of the State List or not wherein State Government can levy tax only on the sale and purchase of goods within the State, remains to be seen. However here in this article only status and claim of entry tax under the current provisions are discussed. Such tax in advance is to be charged only on the goods which are meant for sale or use in manufacturing or processing of any goods for sale. Second proviso to section 6(7) further provides that such tax collected in advance shall be counted towards final liability of the taxable person. No goods have been notified as yet u/s 6(7) on which tax in advance is to be charged, however section 6(8) creates a deeming legal fiction by which entry tax has been considered as tax in advance u/s 6(7). Entry tax deemed as advance tax to be counted toward final liability: After the introduction of provisions of section 6(7) and 6(8) the status of entry tax is of a tax in advance under the provisions of Punjab VAT Act, 2005. Therefore its adjustment and claim towards the output liability should be allowed as advance tax and not as entry tax, as per the second proviso to sub-section 7 of section 6. Meaning thereby if a person pays entry tax (now advance tax) on certain goods and uses them in manufacturing of tax free goods then claim of such entry tax(deemed as advance tax) should be allowed as per the IInd proviso to section 6(7). Thus a person manufacturing tax free goods having nil final liability is liable to get the refund of entry tax paid by him as such entry tax paid(deemed advance tax) has to be counted towards final liability of the taxable person. The question may be raised that provisions of section 13-A will restrict input tax credit of entry tax paid in the above mentioned case, but it should be noted that provisions of section 13-A starts with words "Subject to other provisions of this Act", therefore section 13-A is bound by the provisions of section 6(7) and 6(8) of Punjab VAT Act, 2005.Hence credit of entry tax deemed as advance tax is no more conditional one as per the provisons of section 13-A. Validity of processing fee under rule 40-A of Punjab VAT Rules, 20051 comments Thursday, August 15, 2013
Punjab Government levied an annual processing fee of Rs. 800 last year by way of Rule 40-A of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005 on all the taxable persons. Rule 40-A of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005 runs as under:
"Every Taxable person shall pay annual processing fee of rupees eight hundred in the month of October every year and proof of the payment thereof shall be attached alongwith quarterly return." Thus this processing fee has been imposed on all the Taxable persons i.e on the persons having VAT registration. Persons having TOT registration are exempted from this levy. It is notable here that this processing fee has been levied after the introduction of facility of efiling of returns. 'Taxation' is defined in clause (28) of Article 366 of the Constitution of India to mean : "taxation" includes the imposition of any tax or impost, whether general or local or special, and "tax" shall be construed accordingly;" The Constitution of India postulates either a tax or a fee. However, the use of expression 'tax' or 'fee' in a statute is not decisive; as on a proper construction thereof and having regard to its scope and purport, 'fee' may also be held to be a tax. The definition of 'tax' in terms of Clause (28) of Article 366 of the Constitution is wide-CCE vs Chhata Sugar Co. Ltd. (2004) 3 SCC 466. A fee is ussualy a charge for a service provided to the payer by the receipient of such fee. Processing fee is ussualy levied on a person who obtains a loan, a credit card, or hires someone to perform some type of service.Processing fees is ussualy used to pay for paperwork services or other kinds of miscellaneous charges. Although rule 40-A doesnot specify the service in lieu of which this processing fee has been levied. But one may persume from the name of the fee that such fee has been levied in lieu of the service of processing of returns, documents, efiling of retuns, etc. The question here is now, whether providing better tax administration is a service to the taxpayer? Isnt it the duty of the exchequer to facilitate the tax administration so as to encourage payment of taxes by the general public.Recently Central Government has also announced for setting up tax administration reformation commission. Income Tax Department also provide the better facilities of efiling and processing of tax returns but no fee is charged. Improving tax administration helps in improving tax collection and it is beyond understanding that how improving it is a service to the taxpayer. Charging a processing fee seems a levy imposed as administration charges. At this juncture certain relevant judgements are quoted herebelow: Imposition of some administrative charges to collect levy cannot be stated to be just a fee. Rather it is a tax. So, there has to be legal authority for imposition of administrative charges.-CCE v Chhata Sugar Co. Ltd. (2004) 3 SCC 466. Tax by itself doesnot confer any special benefit on the person taxed. There is no quid pro que element between a taxpayer and the taxing authority; on the other hand, fee is a charge for any service rendered by the receiving authority to the payer. Fee may be imposed by rules or bye laws-Commr., Hindu Religious Endowments v Sri Lakshmindra ZThirtha Swamiar of sri Shirur Mutt AIR 1954 SC 282. It has been held in Bimal Chand Banerjee v State of M.P. (1970) 2 SCC 467; Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v Sharadkumar Jayantikumar Paswalla (1992) 3 SCC 285; K.T. Moopil Nair v State of Kerala AIR 1961 SC 552.that a tax under article 265 of the Constitution can be imposed only by way of legislation. It is not permissible to impose some tax by way of bye-laws or rules. Criterias for selection of cases for scrutiny assessment for F.Y. 2013-14 under Income Tax Act, 19610 comments Wednesday, August 7, 2013
CBDT has laid down and disclosed the guidelines for selection of cases for scrutiny assessment under section 143(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 for the financial year 2013-14. This disclosure has been made after the direction of Delhi High Court in a recent case namely Joginder Pal Gulati vs OSD-CPIO, to disclose the norms of scrutiny assessment.
E-trip in Punjab-an uncontrolled delegated legislation?0 comments Tuesday, August 6, 2013
The area of trade, commerce and business is at present under a rigourous administrative regulation. Broad powers to regulate trade and commerce have been conferred on administrative authorities through statutes or rules.
Legislature sometimes leave a large amount of discretion in the hands of administrative authorities. Legislation conferring powers on the executive sometimes is drafted in broad and general terms that it leaves a large area of choice to the administrator to apply the law at his sweet will, and such legislation sometimes does not specify clearly the conditions and circumstances subject to which, and the norms with reference to which, the executive must use the powers conferred on it, which endangers a legal proverb coming true i.e "power corrupts a man and absolute power corrupts a man absolutely."
The latest example of such legialation can be found in the law implementing E-Trip in Punjab under the Punjab VAT Act, 2005. E-Trip means the reporting of intra-state transactions meant for trade relating to the specified goods on the virtual information collection centre i.e on the official website of the Excise and Taxation Department. In simple terms it is a mandatory reporting of any movement of specified goods within the state meant for trade on the Department's website before such movement starts.
Specified goods for the purpose of E-trip have been defined u/r 2(hh) of Punjab VAT Rules, 2005, which says that specified goods means the goods of certain value for the purpose of rules 64-A and 64-B, respectively, as specified by the Commissioner from time to time.
The commissioner has been given a very wide discretionary power to impose E-trip on any goods and on any value of the goods without any check and control and without any criteria prescribed for exercising such power. Furthermore relevant rules for E-trip i.e rules 64-A and 64-B also confers discretionary power on the Commissioner to also prescribe maximum transition time for delivery of such goods from one destination to another.
Thus Commissioner has been given absolute power not only to regulate the inter-state as well as intra-state movement of goods in terms of its pre-reporting but also regulating the transition time for such movement of goods from one destination to the other.
No doubt conferment of administrative discretionary power is neccessary for the smooth implementation of any law, but how much discretion can be conferred on the executive to control and regulate trade and commerce is a question to be asked.
The general principle in this connection should be that the power conferred on the executive should not be arbitrary, unregulated by any rule or principle and that it should not be left entirely to the discretion of any authority to do anything it likes without any check or control by any higher authority.
A law or order which confers arbitrary and uncontrolled power upon the executive in the matter of regulating trade or business in normally available commodities cannot but be held to be unreasonable-Dwarka Pd. vs State of U.P. AIR 1954 SC 224.
The law while granting a discretionary power to the executive should also lay down grounds and norms subject to which such discretionary power is to be exercised.
Rule 2(hh) and Rules 64-A and Rules 64-B no where have prescribed such guidelines or grounds or criteria for exercising discretionary power by the Commissioner to specify the goods for the purposes of e-trip. The power given under Rule 2(hh) seems uncontrolled. There seems to be no check on the discretionary power granted to the executive relating to e-trip.
At present E-trip has been imposed on few items only keeping the other items out of its ambit and the limit fixed for the transaction is Rs 50000. What is the criteria for determining this monetary limit or the goods, nobody knows. In the current scenario where the inflation is at its peak, prices of goods rising high, monetary limit of Rs. 50000/- is too small for the businessmen operating at small scale who still may not have any access to computers and internet and thereby adding to their costs and hindering their trade.
Tomorrow e-trip may be implemented on a transaction of Rs. 1000/- also, as no criteria whatsoever has been prescribed for specifying the goods or determinng the monetary limit and the Commissioner also need not have any prior permission of the State Government for regulating the trade and commerce in the grab of implementing etrip on any goods.
There should have been provision laying down the norms or criteria for exercising the power under Rule 2(hh) or under the rules relevant to e-trip or there should have been a check on such absolute power by the State Government.
In nut shell broad powers present possibilities of being misused and exercised in an arbitrary manner. Therefore it becomes neccessary to devise proper safeguards against such an eventuality so that injustice is not done, trade and commerce are not effected and the fundamental rights especially of freedom of trade and profession guaranteed under article 19(1)(g) of Constuitution remains uneffected. Courts have to play a major role in the process of controlling the functioning of the administration.
Issuing C form is statutory obligation of buyer, can be enforced by a writ petition in the High Court0 comments Monday, July 8, 2013
Many a times I receive queries on a common problem faced by many dealers all over India that what to do when the interstate purchaser of goods refuses or doesnot issue the requisite C forms after purchasing the goods at concessional rate of CST @ 2%. The only solution many people feel is the filing of Civil suit for the recovery of such C forms or the balance tax along with the interest from the refusing buyer. CBDT's instructions on ractification applications u/s 154 of Income Tax Act0 comments Friday, July 5, 2013
The CBDT has issued Instruction No. 03/2013 dated 05.07.2013 with regard to the the directive issued by the Delhi High Court in Court on Its Own Motion vs. UOI 352 ITR 273 on the procedure to be followed on the receipt and disposal of rectification applications filed u/s 154 of the Act. The CBDT has set out a detailed procedure on where applications should be received, the maintenance of registers and their disposal.
As per these instructions it has been strictly directed to all the officers to dispose off the ractification applications u/s 154 within a period preferably of 2 months as prescribed in the citizen charter but not later than 6 months as prescribed u/s 154 of the Income tax Act, 1961.
Applications u/s 154 will also have to be given neccessarly an acknowledgement number and every application is to be filed in the Online Ractification Register.
The CBDT has also issued Instruction No. 04/2013 dated 05.07.2013 with regard to the directive issued by the Delhi High Court in Court on Its Own Motion vs. UOI 352 ITR 273 that the demand should not be enforced in cases where no intimation u/s 143(1) was sent by the field authorities in respect of returns which were processed prior to 31.03.2010.
Hopefully these instructions will help in quick disposal of ractification applications u/s 154 of Income tax act, 1961. The instructions can be downloaded herebelow: CBDT Instructions Share | Authority for advance ruling under State VAT Act cannot give clarifications under CST Act0 comments Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Andhra Pradesh High court in Prathista Industries Limited vs Commercial tax Officer [2013] 61 VST 58 (AP) has held that Authority for advance ruling under State VAT Act cannot act as Authority for Advance Ruling under Central sales Tax Act, 1956. The High Court held that provisions relating to the "Advance ruling" in State Act are not applicable to proceedings for assessment, reassessment, collection and enforcement of payment under CST Act, therefore authority for advance ruling constituted under State VAT Act cannot give clarifications as such authority under Central Saless Tax Act, 1956. Service Tax on Builders2 comments Sunday, June 16, 2013
The revenue and the builders have always been at
dispute when comes to leviability of service tax on the consideration received
in advance by the builders/developers from the prospective buyers of immovable
property to be constructed.
After the negative list regime the construction of a
complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof, including a complex or
building intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly has been declared to be
a service liable to service tax. However, if the entire consideration from the
prospective buyer is received after
issuance of completion certificate by competent authority then it is outside
the purview of declared service.
No disallowance of Input Tax Credit for merely not charging VAT seperately in VAT invoice0 comments Thursday, June 6, 2013
Punjab VAT Tribunal
in The 21st Century Builders and Engineers vs State of Punjab VSTI
2013 17 C-388 has held that input tax credit cannot be disallowed merely on the
technical ground that VAT has not been charged separately in VAT invoice, when
tax charged on such VAT invoice is duly deposited by the seller.
New income tax rules for determining net agricultural income0 comments Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Finance Act 2013 Has Inserted New Rules For Computation Of Net Agricultural Income & Amended The Definition Of Net Agricultural Income Vide Section 2(13)(c). Text of Such Rules & section Are As Follows:-
Rules for Computation of Net Agricultural Income
Application for VAT registration cannot be rejected on the ground of insufficient place of business0 commentsMadras High Court in Sri Sundha Metals vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai and another; (2013) 57 VST 73(Madras) has held that registration under VAT Act cannot be denied on the ground that place of business is not sufficient for conducting specified business in the absense of any provision under the Act specifying required area for conducting business. Personal assets required to be disclosed in new ITR forms for A.Y. 2013-14 if income exceeds Rs. 25 lakhs1 comments Tuesday, May 7, 2013
An important change has been made in the new ITR forms launched for the assessment year 2013-14. Now a person having income above Rs. 25 lakh willl have to give information in the income tax return regarding his personal movable and immovable assets except those which are already disclosed in the balance sheet. These details are required to be filed in ITR 3 and ITR 4 forms only and not in ITR 1 and ITR 2 or ITR 4S Confusing law regarding monthly payment of taxes under Punjab VAT Act, 20050 comments Sunday, May 5, 2013
Rule 36 of Punjab VAT Rules read with section 26 along with section 33 of Punjab VAT Act, 2005 prescribe for the perodicity of filing of returns and payment of due taxes. Efiling of audit reports under Income tax and ITRs if income exceeds Rs. 5 lakh now mandatory1 comments Saturday, May 4, 2013
CBDT has finaly notified new Income Tax return forms for the Assessment year 2013-14. Certain amendments have also been made to Rule 12 of Income Tax Rules which are as follows: 1. Mandatory efiling of audit reports: E-filing of following audit reports shall be mandatory in following cases: Download Income Tax Return forms for assessment year 2013-140 comments
CBDT has notified Income Tax Return forms for the assessment year 2013-14. The return forms in PDF files can be downloaded herebelow:
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
Featured PostTCS to apply only on cash portion of sales transaction CBDT clarifiesWelcome clarification by CBDT on TCS on Cash Sale. CBDT vide Circular No. 23/2016 dt. 24 June 2016 has clarified on FAQs of stakeholde... AddThisShareThisGet updates via email, just subscribe below and click on activation link afterwards in your emailCategory
Right consultancy at right time avoids unnecessary litigation.
Popular Posts
FollowersAbout Me
FeedjitBlog Archive
WARNING
Nobody is permitted to copy or publish the articles existing on this blog on any website or on any other media without my express permission. Total PageviewsDisclaimer
No one is responsible for any claims if somebody finds that the information/opinions provided in this blog is incorrect and the blog is meant only to share knowledge and exchange views in a meaningful manner.
Useful Links
Powered by Blogger.
|